We are finally working on the book. Stay tuned. It should be done in a couple of weeks (by end of May), and it will be available in electronic form for readers.

Mailing Lists  

Enter your e-mail to join the H.W. community mailing list, and get involved.   Learn More

--- or ---

Enter your e-mail to join the H.W. notifications only list for just official announcements. This is a very low traffic mailing list.

Login Form  

Welcome, Guest
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Supportive Oncologist?

Supportive Oncologist? 21 May 2012 09:18 #233

Hi all,
For those of you who choose to refuse or delay radiation/chemo to pursue natural options, and you are already under the care of an Oncologist, please do not tell them what your intentions are. Simply state that you need some time out to think.

The following story is true, and as I have only discovered today that my sister is doing Radiation I am still bewildered and yet to learn the full extent of what happened.

Having undergone chemo the first time with her bowel cancer, she already had an Oncologist and the same one was still working when the cancer came back earlier this year.
It was inoperable this time and he insisted on radiation, but she wanted to try the Budwig protocol. In order to monitor her progress a future appointment was refused by the Hospital, and she left telling me she would have to "outsource" her scans etc.

Her Oncologist had the hospital phone her 2 hours later, allowing her to have scans at the hospital in 2 weeks.
I told her that was ridiculous since it was too early to tell.
The Oncologist said he was "very supportive and curious" to see how her natural path would go for her! I laughed and she said that he was very nice and understanding and very much open to new ideas....(Oh yeah)

Having been on the Budwig for 3-4 weeks, reports from all who know her and from myself, "Ive never felt so healthy, and I used to feel my tumour, I cant feel the same hardness anymore"

Why order such radioactive scans on someone trying to detox? Why schedule at least 2 that I know of (need to find out exact number and type of scans)
in such a short period?
Why is someone who felt so great on radiation?
Someone who had such a "supportive Oncologist"?

Think about all the possible scenarios here, not directly implying anything,
but please take your "time out" from a treatment decision privately.
Bea58

Re: Supportive Oncologist? 27 Jun 2012 03:08 #241

We have never received a report that our suggestions are not working. We've never had a failure report except for milia cases, which is merely a cosmetic condition. How many oncologists can boast the same? How many can say that their treatments don't regularly kill people, who almost always would have been better without such "help".

It why we made the documentary, 'The Cancer Report'. Concerning the topic of cancer, the facts and true science are unequivocally on our side. Cancer is one of the biggest cover-ups in history.

Re: Supportive Oncologist? 16 Jan 2013 13:52 #373

  • Atwood
  • ( User )
  • OFFLINE
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: 0
Hello Guys Supportive Oncology is cancer care that details all aspects of cancer and its impact on the patient, rather than just focusing on the disease itself. Thus, supportive care involves symptom management, psychosocial support, and treatments to improve the individual's total well beingThanks a lot!

Re: Supportive Oncologist? 01 Feb 2013 08:03 #381

I get it. It's a freakin' marketing term meant to make radioactively frying someone sound warm and friendly. It's giving me warm fuzzies just thinking about it. Isn't a "supportive" oncologist like a murderously psychotic Mr. Rogers who will poison you in your sleep? When they have to play psychological games to keep their patients, then that in itself speaks volumes. Perhaps we've been hurting their business a little too much in recent times. Don't you just hate that?
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.38 seconds