How to Make Genuine Colloidal Silver at Home
See our new movie at YouTube for free.
Search Reports:

Member Login  

H.W. Mailing Lists  

Enter your e-mail to join the H.W. Community Mailing List, and get involved.   Learn More

--- or ---

Enter your e-mail to join the H.W. Notifications List for just official announcements. This is a very low traffic mailing list.

Top 100 Stories  

Cure Hypothyroidism
Remedy Scabies
Eliminating Parasites
Eliminate Shingles
Ignore Dentists
Chewing Gum
Treating Depression
Amish and Autism
Brown Recluse Spiders
Budwig Regimen
Silica Supplements
Iodine Supplementation
Natural Stimulants
Bee Stings
Body pH and Disease
M.M.S. Fraud
Curing Milia
pH Food Chart
Bell's Palsy
Gardasil Whistle Blower
The Cancer Report
Curing Endometriosis
Subway Shame
Treating Hepatitis
Decaffeinated Drinks
Curing Ulcers
Eliminating Fleas
Cure Autism
Forbidden Fruits
Curing Candida
Curing Celiac Disease
Disposable Diapers
Colloidal Silver
Best Supplements
Zinc Supplements
Air Fresheners
Consumer Lab
Soy Dangers
Mike Adams
Heart Disease
Vaccine Ingredients
Michael J. Fox
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Rancid Oils
Foot Cleanses
H.C.G. Diet Scam
Dr. Andrew Weil
Quickly Shift Body pH
Dieting Right
Treating Epilepsy
Chlorophyll Supplementation
Table Salt
Eye Drops
Dangerous Deodorants
Curing Diabetes
Audio Archive
Migraine Headaches
Ear Aches
MSG and Taurine
Niacin Supplements
S.S.R.I. Drugs
The Green Drink
Erectile Dysfunction
Modified Foods
Hormone Regulator
Poisonous Plastics
Teeth Grinding
Canola Oil
Remedy Food Poisoning
Dangerous Light Bulbs
God's Nutrition
ACS: Cancers Heal
Corruption at WikiAnswers
Cayenne Pepper
Non-Stick Cookware
Jim Humble Debate
Sodium Benzoate
Activated Carbon
Cluster Headaches
Low Platelet Counts
Swine Flu
Everyone Has A.D.D.
Medical Quotations
Chemical Fertilizers
Fire Safe Cigarettes
Toxic Tampons
Lung Infections
Radioactive Foods
Sunscreen Lies
Balancing Hormones
Forced Experiments
Dangerous Bottles
Monsanto Killing Bees
So Evil
Contact Lenses
DCA Fraud
Whole Foods Market

Proof That The Swine Flu Epidemic Was Man Made and Intentional

Written by Print 

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has a patent for, Genetically Engineered Swine Influenza Virus and Uses Thereof (patent #8124101). It was filed in 2005 for approval. The makers of the human variant of the swine flu virus waited until the patent was finally approved in January of 2009, before unleashing the virus into the wild. The makers of the swine flu vaccine had begun the lengthy patenting process long before the swine flu supposedly existed, which means that the outbreak was no accident, and the virus is clearly not natural. Patents only apply to man-made items, and natural things cannot be patented. The virus conveniently went public only after its vaccine patent was approved, after patiently waiting 3 years for that to happen. The pandemic was declared just five months after the patent was approved, in June of 2009. The tremendous hysteria following the outbreak was promoted by the same groups who had invented this genetically engineered virus. The word "invented" was actually used to describe the virus in the patent application.

The patent application states:

"The present invention relates, in general, to attenuated swine influenza viruses having an impaired ability to antagonize the cellular interferon (IFN) response, and the use of such attenuated viruses in vaccine and pharmaceutical formulations. In particular, the invention relates to attenuated swine influenza viruses having modifications to a swine NS1 gene that diminish or eliminate the ability of the NS1 gene product to antagonize the cellular IFN response. These viruses replicate in vivo, but demonstrate decreased replication, virulence and increased attenuation, and therefore are well suited for use in live virus vaccines, and pharmaceutical formulations."

This human-infecting variant of the virus was not first discovered in the wild. It was invented. Without genetic engineering, animal viruses seldom infect humans, because human DNA varies too greatly from animal DNA. There were rare cases of cross contamination with certain diseases, such as cow pox, but these infections require contact with the animal and are not contagious between humans. This has been the situation throughout almost all of history. That is until animal viruses were given biotechnology and biowarfare industry help.

The patent ownership is claimed by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (New York University), St. Jude Children's Hospital, and the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture. Under the inventors section of the patent are listed:

  • Palese, Peter (Leonia, NJ)
  • Garcia-Sastre, Adolfo (New York, NY)
  • Webby, Richard J. (Memphis, TN)
  • Richt, Juergen A. (Ames, IA)
  • Webster, Robert G. (Memphis, TN)
  • Lager, Kelly M. (Colo, IA)

Why would an attenuated (weakened for the purpose of vaccines) genetically engineered virus exist, and then be patented prior to any outbreaks in history -- when it doesn't even exist outside the laboratory? When we first reported on the swine flu in our audio show, we mentioned the implausibility of it having occurred naturally. For swine flu, avian flu and human flu, DNA cannot naturally mix without destroying themselves. It does not happen in nature.

If the patented version of the swine flu virus now being put into vaccines failed to be identical to the version that is now being found in humans, then it would be completely useless for creating immunity. Therefore, since the above patent is for a genetically engineered virus, the virus that spread throughout the population had to be genetically engineered in an identical fashion, and it must have originated from the same facility.

The very existence of the patent demonstrates that it was intentionally produced for a commercial endeavor. The only question that remains is, was this germ warfare attack against the U.S. public accidental, or intentional? Considering that they had this vaccine ahead of time, and then coordinated a media cover-up yields a depressing answer to this question.

This virus became weaker the longer that it existed in the wild. It was initially killing a lot of people in Mexico, but then the virus quickly mutated, and it became much less harmful. Due to the virus' rapid mutations, the swine flu vaccine is ironically unlikely to be helpful against current strains. What was initially unleashed upon the public was horrific, and the weakening of this virus through natural mutation was never intended by its manufacturers at the medical schools, and within the U.S. Government. The fact that this virus essentially neutralized itself over time is an indicator that God has not yet completely abandoned us.


Related Articles

Vaccine Ingredients and Vaccine Secrets

The Amish Don't Get Autism but They Do Get Bio-Terrorism

The Inflammatory Topic of Vaccines During a Health Information War

The Marvelous Health of Unvaccinated Children



Comments (10)
  • kate purnell

    The patent is not for a vaccine FOR a genetically engineered virus, the genetically engineered virus IS the vaccine. The patent describes how you can genetically manipulate an existing virus to make a new attenuated one "capable of generating an immune response and creating immunity but not causing illness or causing fewer and/or less severe symptoms, i.e., the viruses have decreased virulence." [0023]

    If the genetically engineered viruses that are described by this patent were "set loose" on the country... nothing would happen. That's because they are weakened and do not proliferate. By design.

  • C. Thomas Corriher (Managing Editor)

    That would mean wasting billions of dollars on a vaccine that did nothing, and I'm not buying into that. A vaccine is only useful if it is identical to a virus in the wild. For this vaccine to be useful, the same genetically engineered virus would have to be released.

    That whole thing about playing with a virus to somehow miraculously create immunity for viruses which do not exist (or exist yet) is all smoke and mirrors. The immune system does not work that way, and it never has. I know it, they know it, and you ought to know it too.

    By its very definition, a virus is something that replicates by design, and if it didn't, then the immune system would likely ignore it. That's why at best, weakened viruses are used in vaccines instead of dead ones. When they say a vaccine virus is "inactivated", it is part of the deceptive marketing games meant to make us feel safe. In fact, all vaccines have the potential to infect a person with the very disease that they are meant to stop. This, of course, means the release of this virus could have been accidental, and we know they were experimenting on pigs, where it supposedly originated. It is the sort of thing that is to be expected when people start playing God.

  • kate purnell


    "That whole thing about playing with a virus to somehow miraculously create immunity for viruses which do not exist (or exist yet) is all smoke and mirrors. "

    This seems to be the source of your confusion. You think that the patent is somehow for a specific genetically engineered virus that is now - by some incredible coincidence - able to be used to protect against a virus that is prevalent today. Well, if that were the case I could see where your fear would be founded. But you really need to be able to read the patent. It is not referring to genetically engineered viruses that they somehow created and catalogued and were FIXED as of the application in 2005. No, "genetically engineered virus" refers to the product of a PROCESS they describe in the patent, a process that can be applied to any number of eligible viruses that existed at the time or could arise in the future. And yes, that process could potentially be used to create a genetically-attenuated version of 2009 H1N1 suitable for vaccines.

    However, you need not worry about that just yet. This is not the method being used in today's H1N1 mist vaccines in any case. Just because someone got a patent on a process doesn't mean anyone has approvale to actually use that process to make vaccines. This is a novel proposal and even if it works (surprisingly, you don't have to prove something works to get a patent) an enormous amount of testing would still need to be conducted before it was implemented in production. Sort of like growing flu viruses in caterpillars instead of eggs. Interesting idea... but not likely to be in production anytime soon.

    So call it "playing God" if you like. I, for one, am grateful for the scientists doing research in this area. There will come a day where we will need a very fast way to respond to a very deadly virus, and the existing, painfully slow, methods of creating vaccines will let far too many people die. God bless those who are devising new ways to deal with such a crisis.

  • kate purnell

    The article above is incorrect in so many places, and now that I realize it is ALL over the conspiracy-web, I'll wrap it up with this post. Here are the errors and corrections:

    "In other words, the makers of the Swine Flu Vaccine began the lengthy patenting process long before the Swine Flu supposedly existed". The patent applicants and assignees are not the "makers of the vaccine". And the patent has not even been granted yet. January 8, 2009 was the date the application was PUBLISHED, not the date the patent was granted. It still has not been granted.

    "prior to any outbreaks in history"?? Huh? Swine flus have been around since 1918. Remember? And maybe the author should do a little reading (try the patent application, perhaps) about how prevalent - and scary - swine flu rightfully is. Such as section [0014].

    "After all, Swine Flu, Avian Flu and human flu D.N.A. cannot naturally mix without destroying themselves." Yes, they can, and if the author had actually READ the patent she would know how and why. Hint: PIGS.

    "Therefore, since the above patent is for a genetically engineered virus, then the virus spreading through the population would also have to be genetically engineered in an identical fashion." False, as repeatedly explained by various people here.

    "This virus became weaker the longer that it was in 'existence' (unleashed). It was initially killing a lot of people in Mexico, but then the virus mutated, and it became much less harmful." Untrue. Genetic typing has shown that the virus has not significantly changed since Mexico.

    "Therefore, it is unlikely that the Swine Flu Vaccine will be at all helpful against the current mutated strains." False. The H1N1 vaccine uses A/California/07/2009 (H1N1), which was first collected in California in April. The CDC weekly FluView report tracks the antigenic characterization of viruses collected each week. 99.7% of the viruses collected are still showing as related to A/California/07/2009 (H1N1). The vaccine still protects.

    "The only question that remains is, was this bio-weapon attack against the public accidental, or intentional?" No, the only question that remains is, are you - the reader - going to get your information from real sources or from some ridiculous website where someone with too much free time and no sense can write anything they want. Conspiracy theory EQUALS coincidence theory most of the time... and neither one makes ANY sense at all when the alleged coincidences don't even exist.

  • Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher)

    So, the fact that the patent mentions the swine influenza virus multiple times (including in the title) has no bearing on this patent? Why exactly do you believe that they mention that virus, if they were patenting a method? Why would they mention the swine influenza virus a grand total of 715 times? You must have missed that when reading the patent.

    You mention that the virus has not significantly changed since the outbreak in Mexico. Why don't you tell us just how significant the change has to be before exposure to the original virus no longer provides immunity?

  • C. Thomas Corriher (Managing Editor)

    Kate, please learn something about how the human immune system works before making a fool of yourself in public, or is it that you work for them? I notice how you label the alternative media and alternative medicine community as kooks to be dismissed and disrespected. So why exactly are you here? Something really does not compute with that. Why did you need to lie? Practically every assertion that you made can be easily disproven with 30 minutes on a search engine (or a basic health book), and I would begin that process if I did not have much more important things to do, and if I thought that most readers did not already see it for themselves. (For instance the 1918 flu was the SPANISH flu, NOT the swine flu ... and etc.) I don't know what brought you here, or what your agenda is, but it was a nice try, and I have much more confidence in the intelligence of our readership than you do. If this is all just crazy conspiracy stuff, then why are you so afraid of it? I have a couple of theories as to why that is. You just go ahead and insult us, call us all crazy, and laugh while you still can. Just remember that our side is beginning to win, and we are gaining strength every day. I know astroturf and damage control when I see it.

    Have a nice day.

  • Mikey  - Did you ever stop to think

    Maybe the (attenuated) virus is even worse. If the engineered virus causes a smaller response from the body, what's to say it does not simply live in the background (along with whatever else is there) causing slow havoc.

  • CIDPUSA  - Why the H1N1 cases got world wide press

    I cannot imagine why a few cases of H1N1 would get top news coverage and front page articles in the news.
    Does this mean the Free press is not free any more!

  • Spin Spin Sugar  - Learn to Lie.

    "Therefore, it is unlikely that the Swine Flu Vaccine will be at all helpful against the current mutated strains." False. The H1N1 vaccine uses A/California/07/2009 (H1N1), which was first collected in California in April. The CDC weekly FluView report tracks the antigenic characterization of viruses collected each week. 99.7% of the viruses collected are still showing as related to A/California/07/2009 (H1N1). The vaccine still protects.

    Okay Kate. Where did all the other flu go? I think it would be statistically impossible for such a 'dangerous' flu to have spread so rampantly that it now accounts for 99.7% of the reported virus samples collected, yet not cause the outbreak that the highly trained staff of the WHO warned us about. So really, which is it? We all need to be vaccinated to stop the spread of this danger, or we all need to be vaccinated because this danger is already 99.7% around us. Either way, you need to learn to lie better.

  • J Humble  - Missing Research Papers

    It sounds like such an obvious logical thing. Weaken the disease virus or bacteria and inoculate a human with it and his immune system will develop anti bodies for the full strength disease. Great idea, BUT NO ONE HAS PROVEN THAT. Start at the beginning instead of half way through. There are no clinical trial papers where they proved that a weak strain of any disease creates antibodies that will stop the full strength disease. Once more Medical Science fools you. Why don't you check it out?

Only members may write comments.

Follow Us  

Get the Book!  

Hardback version of Defy Your Doctor and Be Healed
Get the book and other superior products from the Health Wyze Store.

Newest Audio Show  

Episode 36

Ask the Staff  

Thomas and Sarah from Health Wyze Media

Ask your questions, and we'll respond to the good ones.


This offer is an exclusive perk for Health Wyze readers. Use coupon code "hw10" just before checkout to redeem.

Health Wyze Colloidal Copper Lotion

The Health Wyze Antiperspirant

The Health Wyze Brew