Special Investigative Report: Why You Should Boycott the Susan Komen Pink Ribbon Foundation and Its Sponsors

Written by Sarah Cain Saturday, 30 October 2010 23:49

It may stun many readers to learn that the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation sponsors Planned Parenthood, the "family planning" organization that performs assembly line abortions.  These two organizations make surprisingly fitting partners, since they are both militant promoters of a feminist ideology and internally have a death culture fixation.  These ideals overshadow any amount of compassion for the women who they supposedly help.  The ultimate product of these partner organizations is broken families and widespread deaths, as will be explained.  Planned Parenthood manages to achieve its anti-family and anti-Christian agenda in a direct and obvious manner. The Komen foundation is more subtle with its own internal strategy groups, such as the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender National Advisory Council.

The amount of money that the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation has donated to Planned Parenthood is currently being kept obscured. One source reported that $730,000 was donated in 2009 alone, but we were unable to confirm this.  A public relations representative from the Komen foundation disclosed to The Health Wyze Report that the amount of money annually funneled into Planned Parenthood is in the range of "about $700,000", which lends strong credence to the previous report.  The foundation boasts that it has "invested" $1.5 billion since it's foundation in 1982.  Exactly what it does with its funding is not disclosed, but is instead shrouded in secrecy and disguised by buzz words such as 'energizing science'.

The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (alias Susan G. Komen for the Cure) maintains that the money given to Planned Parenthood is used for early breast cancer screening provided at the clinics.  They have several pages on their website dedicated to keeping the news media pacified about their Planned Parenthood partnership.  They claim that all such donations are specifically earmarked for breast cancer screening only.  What they carefully omit mentioning is the fact that these breast cancer screenings cause breast cancers, due to the radiation exposure.  Likewise the contraceptive pills issued, and the abortions performed, greatly increases the cancer risks, as well.  They furthermore neglect to mention that money donated for radioactive screenings at Planned Parenthood frees funds that would have been otherwise used, so that the boosted Planned Parenthood funds can be reallocated to other services.  The money donated to Planned Parenthood will undoubtedly be used for all of their services, even if it is just indirectly, as just noted.  This would be considered horrendous to many pro-life advocates and churches that regularly donate to this organization.  Of course, these organizations, like the rest of us, are intentionally kept ignorant of the special partnership between Komen and Planned Parenthood, and of the real agendas.

Komen appears to have a policy of specifically partnering with unethical organizations.  For instance, you will never see their pink ribbons on organic foods, ever.  They tend to only promote cancer-causing foods, and products.  The irony of their past support of aluminum-containing (breast cancer causing) deodorants is staggering.  Their ironic partnership with KFC was mocked publicly by comedian Stephen Colbert, since their desire for money was obviously more important than truly stopping cancer.  Judging from their checkered history, we have to wonder if an agenda of spreading cancer plays a role too.  The organization's partners range from aspartame-laced yogurts to MSG-containing pizzas.  None of this could be accidental.  Under the banner of saving lives, we actually find that it is an organization that promotes disease in its every action and deed.  Like in the case of politicians, we should examine what they are actually doing and have done, instead of what they are saying that they are doing.

You are likely to find the sneaky Naturally Fresh brand of deodorant in Whole Food's Market.  Its ingredient's list states, "natural mineral salts (potassium alum)".  Alum is made from aluminium, an accumulative carcinogenic heavy metal.  It is a compound of aluminium and phosphorus, and is used instead of aluminium chlorohydrate to disguise the fact that the product still contains aluminium.  This is typical of a pink ribbon product, so buyer beware of the pink ribbon.

 

The evidence strongly suggests that the Komen organization has no sincere interest in the cause or cure of cancer.  Any widely known cure would immediately dry-up their funding, so a cure is the last thing they want; and this is why they carefully sidestep mentioning the safe and effective cures that have existed since the epidemic of cancer began in the early 20th century.  One would think that they would know about existing cures with their billions in research money, since the discovery of the cause got the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1913 (Dr. Otto Warburg).  Perhaps Nobel Prizes in medicine are not mainstream enough for them to take seriously either.  One need not have billions in research funding to discover effective cures or the causes of cancer; for all that is needed is a free card to any public library, or an Internet connection. Their continued silent complicity with medicine that easily kills over 10 times the number of people who are killed by the cancers themselves is positive proof that medicine (disease) is just a for-profit business for them, even though they have conned their way into not being taxed like other profitable businesses.  Meanwhile, as the cancer industry carnage continues, their profits have gone from the millions into the billions.  By the way, where exactly is their research?

Corporations who market with Komen's pink ribbons do so because they get greater profits due to increased customer sales.  It is a con job of legendary proportions that despicably targets the most well-intentioned of our society.  Awhile, not so much as a finger has been lifted in any honest effort to save any person's life.  Readers may wish to begin a quest to locate any person who has ever been helped by Komen, minus those on the take, of course.

Conversely, the deaths from the cancers caused by their corporate partners, and more directly from the abortions, are easily in the millions.  The use of pink in their marketing, and the constant female-only imagery actually shows the unfortunate influence of feminism in our society.  Other news organizations shy away from all criticism of Komen, since questioning the organization's ethics is an easy way to get labeled as "sexist", and then all the feminists will surely proclaim that the news organization heartlessly wants to victimize females having cancer.  Thus, Komen tends to be immune from criticism and honest coverage about its activities.  To other news outlets, this "charity" is beyond investigation.

 

Despite public comments from Komen's representatives to the contrary, abortion increases the risk of breast cancer.  It is not a small increase.  For virtually every category of women, in every age group, the chance of getting cancer more than doubles.  When abortion is combined with birth control pill usage, and radioactive exams (both given by their partner organization), then one has a cancer time bomb.  It practically becomes a matter of when the women get cancer instead of if.  It is interesting to note that the surest way to prevent breast cancer is to have a child and breast feed him, and equally interesting is that neither organization mentions this in their literature.  They absolutely avoid this topic.  So much for saving lives.  These "family planning" cancer links have been proven in studies dating back to the 1970's, but Komen apparently has not noticed the prolific volumes of data any more than it has noticed Nobel Prize winning cancer breakthroughs.  It instead cherry picks the few studies that support its agenda.

Women become more vulnerable to breast cancer as soon as they become pregnant, showing the unique influence of pregnancy-related hormones, and many believe that a permanent hormonal imbalance is created whenever an abortion interrupts the natural birthing cycle.  This theory explains the correlation between abortion and breast cancers.  It is similar to the way in which women with c-sections cannot lose weight afterward, since the natural birthing process was interrupted, which in-turn prevented their hormones from automatically resetting.  Following pregnancy, women who breast feed their children are well protected against breast cancer.  The cancer resistance is much greater for these woman than for those who did not have children.  It is for this reason that breast cancer was once referred to as "Nun's Disease".

"The longer women breast feed the more they are protected against breast cancer."

— The Lancet, 2002

Much of the money received by the Komen organization for prevention of cancer is purportedly just funneled back into the same failed disease-management industry, which is actually causing the problems in the first place.  True charities with nothing to hide do not conceal their financial records.  In fact, they normally boast about their charitable spending.  Komen breaks all of the rules of a standard charity.  It routinely ignores risk factors for cancer when they are in opposition with their corporate sponsors, and it flatly discards scientific evidence.  Of course, these things remind us to ask again, "Where exactly is that research, and what have they accomplished?"

The organization has been under fire from legitimate breast cancer charities, due to its unethical marketing schemes.  Particularly highlighted as an example is a partnership with Yoplait, which donated ten cents for each lid that was mailed in by consumers.  At the time, postage for this cost 37 cents.  Thus, the campaign was largely a complete waste of money, but it managed to get people to buy the product at an increased rate, and it required customers to give their address details.  This overall pattern of trapping good people through bait-and-switch tactics is seen throughout the huge pink ribbon industry.

Komen also likes to threaten lawsuits when true non-profits use the phrase "for the cure", and it warns companies to never use the color pink in combination with the word "cure".  Normally, charities do not legally attack others who have the same altruistic goals, but Komen is not a normal charity; and it is arguably not even a charity at all.  As a business, protecting their trademarks is vital.  Jennifer Jenkins, Director of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School, claims that such threats are typically on "shaky legal ground".  Everyday phrases like 'for the cure' cannot be trademarked; but so far, no one has legally challenged this massive corporate superpower's bogus intellectual property claims of owning everything associated with breast cancer.

While they are adamant that they are making a positive difference toward curing breast cancer, most of their public activity involves supporting organizations that provide cancer-causing procedures or carcinogenic toxins. There is no mention of the risk of false positives for tests, the dangerous effects of radiation exposure, or the bleak outlook for those who follow the corrective procedures that they support.  They also neglect to mention that avoiding an abortion, more often than not, saves two lives.  There's a killing to be made, after all.

 

Komen Pink Ribbon Sponsors: The Wall of Shame (From http://ww5.komen.org/CorporatePartners.aspx)
1 a Minute 180s 3M A&A Optical ACH Food Companies Acushnet American Airlines American Blue Ribbon Holdings American Italian Pasta Company Anchor Bay Entertainment Anne Fontaine Ansell Healthcare Products, LLC Ariela-Alpha International Arizona AFO Ask.com AT&T ATP Electronics, Inc Autobiography of SORAYA avenue Avery Dennison Balance Walking by Foot Solutions Bank of America BCBG MAXAZRIA and ClearVision Optical Beemster Cheese Belcam, Inc. Belk Bernat Bernina of America BIC USA Inc. Bi-Lo, LLC BMW of North America, Inc. Boar’s Head Provisions Co., Inc. Boots Retail USA, Inc. Borders Boston Warehouse Bowl for the Cure Brinker International California Pear Advisory Board Cameo Apple Marketing Association Candy Coburn Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. Carlisle Collection, Ltd. Carnival Cruise Lines Cartier Cause Care, LLC Century Payments Chesapeake Bay Candle Co. Citizen Watch Company of America Coldwater Creek Collegiate Shipping Products, LLC Company C Corning Life Sciences Crabtree & Evelyn Crayola Dallas Cowboys Dansko Del Frisco’s Restaurant Group Dell Deluxe Checks Deuce Brand Dogtopia Dots DOVE Chocolate Dr Pepper Snapple Group DS Waters Eggland's Best, Inc. Electronic Arts Inc. Emdeon Energizer EuroBlooms Everyday Coupon Book Pottinger Nichols Media Group, LLC Evian Exercise TV Ford Motor Company Freed’s Bakery, LLC FRITO LAY FUZE Glacéau SmartWater Honest Tea Ganz General Growth Properties General Mills GUESS GUESS by Marciano Hallmark Gold Crown Stores Hanesbrands Helzberg Diamonds Hewlett-Packard Heys USA Holland America Line Home Shopping Network Igloo Imprintables Warehouse Inliten Irish Dairy Board, Inc. Jingle Heart Kelly Gale Amen Design Kentucky Oaks Kimberly-Clark Kimberly-Clark, Huggies		KitchenAid Kobian USA, Inc. Koch Filter Corporation Koi Design LLC Kyocera La Madeleine LaCroix Sparkling Water Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) LIFE Event-The Val Skinner Foundation LifeWorks Technology Group Litehouse Foods, Inc. Louisville Stoneware Lowe’s Companies, Inc LPGA Golf Clinics for Women Major League Baseball Massage Envy McNeil Nutritionals, LLC MD Jockey Club MegaGoods, Inc. Merck Consumer Care Meredith Corporation Microsoft MMG Corporation Mobile Edge Mrs. Baird's Bakeries NAPA AutoCare Napa Valley Naturals Nature's Flowers NBC Today Show Nestle Purina PetCare Company New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. New Global Charities NKOTB Nonni’s Food Company Nordstrom North American Licensing Company Not Your Daughter's Jeans NYGÅRD International Olivet International On The Border On the Go Hosiery Ontic Golf OPI Oreck Oregon Cherry Growers, Inc. Oriental Trading Company Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. Palmer's Pandora Jewelry Paramount Coffee Payless ShoeSource Pepperidge Farm Perdue Farms Inc. Philips Consumer Lifestyle Pink Ribbon Produce Planet Smoothie PNY Pottery Barn Kids Premium Outlets Princess Cruises Prolacta Bioscience Provide Commerce Quilted Northern Ultra Rally for the Cure Raymond Weil ReCellular REMAX Rich Products Corporation Root Candles Salon Quest LLC Samsung Electronics Europe Santa Barbara Design Studio and Designs by Lolita Sarah Fisher Racing She Colors My Day ShoeDazzle Shuman Produce, Inc. Simon Malls Specialized Bicycle Components Springs Global Stanley Black & Decker Stein Mart Stylemark, Inc. The Hillman Group The Mohawk Group The Republic of Tea Tim Halperin Trident Seafoods Corporation True Religion Brand Jeans Tumi, Inc. Ultradent Products Verbatim Victorinox Swiss Army Wacoal America Walgreens Warner Brothers Yoplait USA Young Dental Zeta Tau Alpha Fraternity Zumba Fitness

 

 

Research Studies

The abortion-breast cancer connection.  Brind J., Baruch College, City University of New York, NY 10010, USA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19462841

Risk Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Women Under the Age of 45 Years.  Jessica M. Dolle, Janet R. Daling, Emily White, Louise A. Brinton, David R. Doody, Peggy L. Porter, and Kathleen E. Malone.  Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.  http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/18/4/1157.abstract

Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence Memorandum 14 for November 15th, 2007, United Kingdom's Parliament. Dr Joel Brind, Baruch College of the City University of New York.  http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/1045/1045we15.htm

Long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortion: review of the evidence.  Thorp JM Jr, Hartmann KE, Shadigian E. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12544786

Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births. Brent Rooney, Byron C. Calhoun, M.D..  Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.  http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf

The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent. Lanfranchi, A.,  Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18771039

Abortion, breast cancer, and informed consent. Kindley J.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10758700

 

Related Articles

A True Story of An Abortion Without The Usual Lies

Cancer Revisited: The Industry Suppressed Budwig Regimen or How To Cure Cancer With Cottage Cheese

A Sick Twist: Obama's Genocidal Czar, and Eugenics Through Health Care Reform

Beware of Deodorants, Especially The "Safe" and "All Natural" Ones

Why Americans Ought To Reevaluate What They Were (Falsely) Taught about Child Birth

Why Women Pay Dearly for Caesarian Sections for the Rest of Their Lives