Thank you so much for providing us with this information! I tend to be so trusting of people (I like to believe they are inherently good. I should know better...) and it makes me sick to find out we've been taken advantage of. At our wedding, rather than give little gifts, we donated in everyone's "honor" to a local breast cancer charity (The Donna Foundation) in memory of my grandmother and my husband's mother. Now I'm wondering how that money was actually used! (At the time, I was unaware that there was actually a cure for cancer - thanks to your website - or I would have chosen to donate our money somewhere else regardless!)
Special Investigative Report: Why You Should Boycott the Susan Komen Pink Ribbon Foundation and Its Sponsors
| Written by Sarah Cain |
 |
|
It may stun many readers to learn that the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation sponsors Planned Parenthood, the "family planning" organization that performs assembly line abortions. The Komen Foundation is also an organization that conveniently neglects to mention that both abortions and routine mammograms are sure methods of inducing breast cancers. In fact, the risk of getting breast cancer from either of these activities alone is greater than the risks of smoking and poor diet combined. The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation may very well be the greatest cause of breast cancer in the world.
Planned Parenthood and the Komen Foundation make surprisingly fitting partners, since they are both militant promoters of a feminist ideology and internally have a death worship culture. These ideals overshadow any amount of compassion for the women who they claim to help. The ultimate product of their agenda is broken families and widespread death, as will be explained later. While Planned Parenthood manages to achieve its anti-family and anti-Christian agenda in a direct and obvious manner, the Komen Foundation is more subtle with its own internal strategy groups, such as the 'Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender National Advisory Council'.
The amount of money that the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation has donated to Planned Parenthood is currently being kept obscured. Life News reported that $730,000 was donated to the abortion organization in 2009 alone, but we are unable to confirm the exact figure. A public relations representative from the Komen foundation disclosed to The Health Wyze Report that the amount of money annually funneled into Planned Parenthood is "about $700,000", which lends strong credence to the earlier figure. The Komen foundation boasts that it has "invested almost $2 billion" since it's inception in 1982. What the Komen Foundation actually does with that funding is never disclosed. The money is shrouded in secrecy, but it is said to be, "energizing science".
"Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities."
-- komen.org
The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (alias Susan G. Komen for the Cure) maintains that the money given to Planned Parenthood is specifically earmarked for breast cancer screenings only. They neglect to mention that the money donated for radioactive screenings at Planned Parenthood actually frees Planned Parenthood's funding, so that it can provide more of its other services. They carefully omit mentioning the fact that the breast cancer screenings cause breast cancers, due to radiation exposure from the tests. Likewise, the contraceptive pills issued at Planned Parenthood, and the abortions performed - more than doubles the cancer risk.
All of these things would be considered horrendous by the pro-life advocates and churches who regularly donate to the Komen Foundation. They are kept ignorant of the special partnership between Komen and Planned Parenthood like the rest of us are. Planned Parenthood is scarcely mentioned on the Komen web site. This has been the case since early 2012, when the organization encountered media criticism about its formerly secret partnership. In the event that the partnership is discovered by Christian benefactors, the Komen Foundation has a statement ready from their token Christian, Norman Roberts, who attempts to rationalize giving donated funds to Planned Parenthood as "moral". Somehow the organization considers its own fundraising to be moral, despite defrauding its own donors as a routine part of its "charity" work.
Komen appears to have a policy of partnering with unethical organizations. For instance, their pink ribbons never appear on organic foods, ever. They tend to promote only cancer-causing foods and products. The irony of their past support of aluminum-containing (breast cancer causing) deodorants is staggering, and their partnership with KFC was mocked publicly by comedian Stephen Colbert. The organization's partners range from aspartame-laced yogurts to MSG-containing pizzas. Under the banner of saving lives, we find an organization promoting cancer in its every action.
|
The evidence suggests that the Komen organization has no sincere interest in the cause or cure of cancer. Any success would immediately dry-up its funding, so cures are the last thing that the foundation wants. This is why its members sidestep mentioning any safer or more effective therapies than the status quo. One need not have billions in research funding to discover effective cures or the causes of cancer; for all that is needed is a free card to any public library, or an Internet connection to learn about the 1931 Nobel Prize discovery of Dr. Otto Warbug. The Komen organization's continued silent complicity with a medical system that easily kills over 10 times the number of people who are killed by cancers is positive proof that maintaining the status quo is their for-profit business model. Meanwhile, as the cancer industry carnage continues, their profits have gone from the millions into the billions, and they do not even pay tax. Where exactly is the two billion dollars of research? After its 31+ years of existance, the organization has yet to show an accomplishment or even a single research paper. On the other hand, it has helped to fund millions of abortions using other peoples' money without their consent. That could be considered an accomplishment from a certain perspective.
Corporations who market with Komen's pink ribbons do so because they get greater profits due to increased customer sales. It is a con job of legendary proportions that despicably targets the most well intentioned of our society. Awhile, not so much as a finger has been lifted in any honest effort to save any person's life. Readers may wish to begin their own quest to locate any cancer victim who has ever been helped by Komen. The cancer deaths indirectly caused by the products of their corporate partners, and more directly from the Komen-sponsored abortions, are easily into the many millions.
Despite dishonest public comments from Komen's representatives to the contrary, abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. It is not a small increase. For virtually every category of women, in every age group, the chance of getting cancer more than doubles after an abortion. When abortions are combined with birth control pill usage, and radioactive exams (both given by their partner organization), then the long term prognosis is bleak.
Something never mentioned by Komen or Planned Parenthood is the fact that the surest way to prevent breast cancer is to have a child and then breast feed him. Women become more vulnerable to breast cancer as soon as they become pregnant, showing the unique influence of pregnancy-related hormones, and many researchers believe that a permanent hormonal imbalance is created whenever an abortion interrupts the natural birthing cycle. This explains the correlation between abortion and breast cancers. It is similar to the way in which women with c-sections cannot lose weight afterward, since the natural birthing process was interrupted, which in-turn prevented their hormones from automatically resetting. Following pregnancy, women who breast feed their children are well protected against breast cancer. Cancer resistance is much greater for these woman than for those who did not have children. This is why breast cancer was once referred to as the "Nun's Disease", because only Nun's (who were celebate) got breast cancer. One might expect these findings to be in Komen's literature, since the organization is so concerned about preventing breast cancers. Instead, the hormone research is a topic that is absolutely avoided, and it has been public since the 1970's.
"The longer women breast feed the more they are protected against breast cancer."
Komen has been under fire from more legitimate breast cancer charities, due to its unethical marketing schemes. Particularly highlighted as an example is a partnership with Yoplait, which donated ten cents for each lid that was mailed in by consumers. At the time, postage for this cost 37 cents. Thus, the campaign was largely a farce, but it managed to get people to buy the product at an increased rate, and it required customers to give their address details to Yoplait marketing. This overall pattern of trapping good people through bait-and-switch tactics is seen throughout the huge pink ribbon industry. It is worth mentioning that Yoplait is a yogurt that features high fructose corn syrup, but it also includes the chemically-engineered form of vitamin A to make it healthy, after all.
Komen also likes to threaten lawsuits whenever legitimate non-profits use the phrase "for the cure", and it warns companies to never use the color pink in combination with the word "cure". Normally, charities do not legally attack others who have the same altruistic goals, but Komen is not a normal charity; and it is very arguably not even a charity at all. Showing its true character as a business, Komen protects what it precieves to be its trademarks. Jennifer Jenkins, Director of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School, claims that such threats are typically on "shaky legal ground". Everyday phrases like 'for the cure' cannot be trademarked; but so far, no one has challenged this massive corporate superpower's bogus intellectual property claims of owning everything associated with the color pink and breast cancer.
While they are adamant that they are making a positive difference toward curing breast cancer, most of their public activity involves supporting non-progressive organizations that provide cancer-causing procedures or carcinogenic toxins. There is no mention of the risk of false positives for tests, the dangerous effects of radiation exposure, or the bleak outlook for those who follow the procedures that they support. They especially neglect to mention that avoiding an abortion, more often than not, saves two lives. There's a killing to be made, after all.
| The Wall of Shame Komen Pink Ribbon Corporate Sponsors http://ww5.komen.org/CorporatePartners.aspx |
||
| 1 a Minute 180s 3M A&A Optical ACH Food Companies Acushnet American Airlines American Blue Ribbon Holdings American Italian Pasta Company Anchor Bay Entertainment Anne Fontaine Ansell Healthcare Products, LLC Ariela-Alpha International Arizona AFO Ask.com AT&T ATP Electronics, Inc Autobiography of SORAYA avenue Avery Dennison Balance Walking by Foot Solutions Bank of America BCBG MAXAZRIA and ClearVision Optical Beemster Cheese Belcam, Inc. Belk Bernat Bernina of America BIC USA Inc. Bi-Lo, LLC BMW of North America, Inc. Boar’s Head Provisions Co., Inc. Boots Retail USA, Inc. Borders Boston Warehouse Bowl for the Cure Brinker International California Pear Advisory Board Cameo Apple Marketing Association Candy Coburn Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. Carlisle Collection, Ltd. Carnival Cruise Lines Cartier Cause Care, LLC Century Payments Chesapeake Bay Candle Co. Citizen Watch Company of America Coldwater Creek Collegiate Shipping Products, LLC Company C Corning Life Sciences Crabtree & Evelyn Crayola Dallas Cowboys Dansko Del Frisco’s Restaurant Group Dell Deluxe Checks Deuce Brand Dogtopia Dots DOVE Chocolate Dr Pepper Snapple Group DS Waters Eggland's Best, Inc. Electronic Arts Inc. Emdeon Energizer EuroBlooms Everyday Coupon Book Pottinger Nichols Media Group, LLC Evian Exercise TV Ford Motor Company Freed’s Bakery, LLC FRITO LAY FUZE Glacéau SmartWater Honest Tea Ganz General Growth Properties General Mills GUESS GUESS by Marciano Hallmark Gold Crown Stores Hanesbrands Helzberg Diamonds Hewlett-Packard Heys USA Holland America Line Home Shopping Network Igloo Imprintables Warehouse Inliten Irish Dairy Board, Inc. Jingle Heart Kelly Gale Amen Design Kentucky Oaks Kimberly-Clark Kimberly-Clark, Huggies |
KitchenAid Kobian USA, Inc. Koch Filter Corporation Koi Design LLC Kyocera La Madeleine LaCroix Sparkling Water Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) LIFE Event-The Val Skinner Foundation LifeWorks Technology Group Litehouse Foods, Inc. Louisville Stoneware Lowe’s Companies, Inc LPGA Golf Clinics for Women Major League Baseball Massage Envy McNeil Nutritionals, LLC MD Jockey Club MegaGoods, Inc. Merck Consumer Care Meredith Corporation Microsoft MMG Corporation Mobile Edge Mrs. Baird's Bakeries NAPA AutoCare Napa Valley Naturals Nature's Flowers NBC Today Show Nestle Purina PetCare Company New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. New Global Charities NKOTB Nonni’s Food Company Nordstrom North American Licensing Company Not Your Daughter's Jeans NYGÅRD International Olivet International On The Border On the Go Hosiery Ontic Golf OPI Oreck Oregon Cherry Growers, Inc. Oriental Trading Company Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. Palmer's Pandora Jewelry Paramount Coffee Payless ShoeSource Pepperidge Farm Perdue Farms Inc. Philips Consumer Lifestyle Pink Ribbon Produce Planet Smoothie PNY Pottery Barn Kids Premium Outlets Princess Cruises Prolacta Bioscience Provide Commerce Quilted Northern Ultra Rally for the Cure Raymond Weil ReCellular REMAX Rich Products Corporation Root Candles Salon Quest LLC Samsung Electronics Europe Santa Barbara Design Studio and Designs by Lolita Sarah Fisher Racing She Colors My Day ShoeDazzle Shuman Produce, Inc. Simon Malls Specialized Bicycle Components Springs Global Stanley Black & Decker Stein Mart Stylemark, Inc. The Hillman Group The Mohawk Group The Republic of Tea Tim Halperin Trident Seafoods Corporation True Religion Brand Jeans Tumi, Inc. Ultradent Products Verbatim Victorinox Swiss Army Wacoal America Walgreens Warner Brothers Yoplait USA Young Dental Zeta Tau Alpha Fraternity Zumba Fitness |
|
The use of pink in Komen marketing, and the constant female-only imagery shows the unfortunate influence of feminism in our society. For this reason, other news organizations shy away from all criticism of Komen, since questioning the organization is an easy way to get labeled as sexist. Thus, Komen tends to be mostly immune from criticism and honest coverage about its activities. To other news outlets, this "charity" is beyond investigation.
Research Studies
The abortion-breast cancer connection. Brind J., Baruch College, City University of New York, NY 10010, USA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19462841
Risk Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Women Under the Age of 45 Years. Jessica M. Dolle, Janet R. Daling, Emily White, Louise A. Brinton, David R. Doody, Peggy L. Porter, and Kathleen E. Malone. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/18/4/1157.abstract
Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence Memorandum 14 for November 15th, 2007, United Kingdom's Parliament. Dr Joel Brind, Baruch College of the City University of New York. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/1045/1045we15.htm
Long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortion: review of the evidence. Thorp JM Jr, Hartmann KE, Shadigian E. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12544786
Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births. Brent Rooney, Byron C. Calhoun, M.D.. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf
The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent. Lanfranchi, A., Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18771039
Abortion, breast cancer, and informed consent. Kindley J. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10758700
Related Articles
A True Story of An Abortion Without The Usual Lies
Video: 'The Cancer Report' Has Been Released!
Cancer Revisited: The Industry Suppressed Budwig Regimen or How To Cure Cancer With Cottage Cheese
A Sick Twist: Obama's Genocidal Czar, and Eugenics Through Health Care Reform
Beware of Deodorants, Especially The "Safe" and "All Natural" Ones
Why Americans Ought To Reevaluate What They Were (Falsely) Taught about Child Birth
Why Women Pay Dearly for Cesarean Sections for the Rest of Their Lives
Comments (7)
-
Date: 10/31/2010 Time: 08:57:19 | Sarah Cain (H.W. Researcher)
We're not really familiar with the Donna Foundation, but you should never be ashamed of trying to do the right thing.
-- Thomas and Sarah
-
Date: 10/31/2010 Time: 17:35:18 |IP:66.212.78.xxx| Aliana - Breast cancer, etc.
I lived in Japan for close to 10 years. When I came back to the US, I was somewhat astonished at the propaganda on soy vis a vis breast cancer, and it's supposed relation to Japanese womens low rate of breast cancer.
It was later discovered that Japanese don't eat that much soy (about 2 tbs. of soy sauce per day is their average dose) - anyone who had been living in Japan as long as I did knew that soy was not a staple there. It is considered the "poor man's meat" and isn't as consumed there half as much as some vegans in the US and Europe consume it.
What is, in my opinion, the reason for the higher rate of breast "health" in Japan is probably the fact that birth control pills were never legalized there. You cannot get hormonal birth control in Japan (though now they have been making moves to get a patch on the market - so they're easing up on that). Japanese depend on condoms and spermicide. Period.
Apparently the agri-biz saw some sort of opportunity here by linking soy with breast health. There is probably no correlation whatsoever.
If you read the books by Dr. John Lee (What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You About Breast Cancer) he makes a direct connection between fake estrogens in BC pills and in the environment (xenoestrogens) and breast cancer as well as prostate cancer.
The number of women coming down with breast cancer these days is simply the chickens coming home to roost. The women getting breast cancer are the same age as those who have been on BC pills most of their lives - these were not available before the 60's.
-
Date: 10/31/2010 Time: 17:38:53 |IP:66.212.78.xxx| Aliana
As for abortion / breast cancer - frankly, I think this could be another red herring for the following reasons:
Promiscuity and / or prostitution may be linked to a higher number of abortions by an individual. Both behaviors may indicate a higher use of BC pills and also substance abuse (alcohol, drugs) which can have a negative impact on a person's health.
-
Date: 11/01/2010 Time: 05:00:27 | Thomas Corriher (Managing Editor)
How is this topic a "red herring" exactly?
Yes, virtually all drugs and excessive alcohol usage does increase health problems, but these do not double the breast cancer risk, like the risk factors that we cataloged.
How exactly does the effects of pharmaceutical toxicity and long term alcohol poisoning dispute the findings about "family planning" effects? Pharmaceutical toxicity is exactly one of our main points. If you wish to disprove us, then you should pick a method other than agreeing with us.
It's like saying, "I drink lots of coffee, which gives me indigestion; so I know that the wart on my toe is obviously caused by the fact that I do not drink enough green tea".
There is a serious disconnect between cause and effect relationships in your argument, in other words.
-
Date: 11/03/2010 Time: 03:37:27 |IP:66.226.34.xxx| john
I am soory to inform you but all government sanctioned charitabale organizations are SCAMS!!! they are brought into being by decievious people under the 501c3 gov. contract or incorporation. most of the money collected by these schams, is diveid up by it's board and what is left is given to unholy political ends. under the law, only 15% of collections needs to go to the cause inorder to keep their 501c3 status. where does the other 85% go??????? useually in someones pocket!
so wake up and stop feeding the evil beast. avoid charities and give to somone in need, someone on the street or in your nieghborhood!!! be wiser then the serpent and gentile as a dove!!!
Powered by Compojoom comment 4.1.5 stable
