// Thomas added // End

Login Form



Health

Doubt They're Evil? About The Umbilical Cord, and The Profitable Procedure For Premature Deliveries

Print E-mail
( 3 Votes )
Written by Thomas Corriher   
Monday, 28 September 2009 21:51


"Another thing very injurious to the child, is the tying and cutting of the navel string too soon; which should always be left till the child has not only repeatedly breathed but till all pulsation in the cord ceases. As otherwise the child is much weaker than it ought to be, a portion of the blood being left in the placenta, which ought to have been in the child."

-- Erasmus Darwin, Zoonomia, 1801  

golfing doctorThe modern hospitalized birthing process usually goes something like this in the U.S..  The mother gives birth to a child, while being thoroughly drugged, and the child's umbilical cord is immediately clamped.  Soon after; male children are circumsized (usually without any pain killers) and then given a round of vaccines on his first day of birth.  This is the modern version of birthing.

There was a time when the umbilical cord was not cut until the cord stopped pulsating.  This would take somewhere between 2 and 20 minutes.  Nowadays, that practice has been abandoned, but it is not due to health considerations.  Early cord clamping provides no known medical benefits to either the child or the mother.  With most deliveries, the cord blood is taken to be sold, because it contains valuable stem cells, including hematopoietic cells.  These are sold for scientific research.  Before this highly lucrative market developed, the blood was allowed to travel to the infant to help him become stronger.  Instead, it is now stolen from him by the hospital staff.  This practice has become such a standard procedure that whenever the blood is not to be saved, it is just thrown away.

Early cord clamping restricts blood that was intended for the infant.  There is usually about a cup of blood transferred through the umbilical cord to the infant at birth.  A huge number of studies show that early cord clamping is a dangerous procedure, which weakens a newborn, and can eventually lead to brain and lung problems (if not immediately).  If the umbilical cord is attached, and the infant is receiving the highly-oxygenated blood, then there is not an urgency to immediately get the infant breathing.  The oxygen from the blood will ensure the survival of the infant.

Waiting for the cord to stop pulsating has become unusual in American hospitals.  Although, there was a time when an infant would have breathed well, and his skin color would have become normal before his cord was clamped.  An infant will naturally begin breathing without any assistance or encouragement if the cord is not immediately clamped.  However, the cord is now clamped long before the infant takes his first breath; producing obvious problems that stem from cutting off his oxygen supply.

Just Sign This Form

Parents usually have no clue that the blood of their child is being taken for research, and this is not accidental.  Parents usually sign the fine print allowing their hospital to "dispose" of the cord blood and placenta, which is actually saved, and then sold to the highest bidder.  Late cord clamping does not go well with the profit agenda.  Ironically, the aim of the research is often to find cures for disorders which are caused by this early cord clamping.  In other words, should we hurt John to help Luke?  We can be sure that early cord clamping is, in some cases, creating future life-long 'customers' of the medical establishment, but this seems to be the normal pattern with allopathic medicine.  Since the cord blood can contain one quarter of the total blood volume of an infant, the loss is a huge blow to his immune system.

Known problems with early cord clamping

  • Anemia
  • Brain lesions
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (S.I.D.S)
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome (R.D.S)
  • Autism
  • Cancer

Premature Deliveries: Here's Where It Really Gets Evil

The cord blood of pre-term infants contains more stem cells than normal infants, and interestingly; early cord clamping is particularly promoted for these infants by the medical establishment, due to its higher market value.  The welfare of the child is not even considered.  For the hospital, this blood is a premium sales item because it contains more nutrients and stem cells than are normal.  These are desperately needed by the weaker infants.  This need is ignored, and the cord blood is literally stolen from the sickly child (by his own doctors -- no less), and then sold for maximum profit.  There is no doubt that this cord blood would result in much healthier premature newborns.

The great majority of people believe that there is no harm in delayed cord clamping, so would it not be wise to leave it attached until it stops pulsating?  Sometimes, the cord is clamped immediately for the convenience of the doctor, who desires to get in and out of the delivery room as quickly as possible, and back into his golf game.  Doctors do have priorities, after all.  Spending an extra 20 minutes in the delivery room would likewise make the customers less profitable for the hospital.

U.S.A.!  We're number 1 number 33!

When we combine this sort of "health care" with the onslaught to the immune system by dozens of completely unnecessary and unsafe vaccinations, then it is a wonder that most American babies survive.  In fact, the U.S. is ranked 33rd in infant survival, according to the United Nations; meaning that there are 33 countries with less infant fatalities by percentage of births.  America with its supposed "best in the world medicine", is in actuality, outdone by such nations as New Caledonia and Brunei.  It's beyond sad.  The delusional mythology behind it all is almost as pitiful. The topic of vaccinations has been covered throughout this website, and there is no need for more elaboration.

The Business of Being Born

Practically anything is better than the status quo, and we recommend watching the documentary, The Business of Being Born, for the options that they will never devulge to you.  You'll be terrified by what they don't tell you.  It is extremely graphic; and therefore, it is not recommended for young audiences.

 

Get Berkely Water Filters at http://www.directive21.com/

 

Comments (5)
  • Jennifer B.  - sources?
    Very interesting and somewhat alarming... do you have sources to point to for your claim that hospitals sell cord blood?
  • Sarah Cain
    You may want to look at this page for more information about the premature clamping of umbilical cords. The website also provides a lot of good information about natural birthing.

    http://www.givingbirthnaturally.com/restricted-umbilical-cord-problems.html

    The 10th edition of the Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 2003 published evidence of hospitals selling the placenta and cord blood. Feel free to look that up.
  • Thomas Corriher
    No, actually we just make everything up as we go, like a creative writing assignment for junior high school. We sit about just thinking up incredible "claims" to make like some sick April fool's joke. That's what we call journalism. Wait a minute... I was confusing us with Fox News, sorry.

    We usually do a better job of citing sources, but the links included in this article are more than adequate for this story. Granted, one of those links has already "disappeared", which is a pattern for lots of our sources after one of our articles exposes something. For that reason, we archive many of our sources for what we consider the "big" stories.

    Meanwhile, there's this thing called Google that's just spiffy for verifying what we write. Let me explain.
    1. Type "google.com" in your browser address bar (look up).
    2. Type "selling umbilical cord blood" in the little google text entry area (without the quotes).
    3. Hit enter.
    4. Read all that neat text that appears.
  • Michelle
    I am all for delayed cord clamping, and I agree it doesn't happen often enough, but not because the "hospital staff" wants to "steal" the cord blood and stem cells. In the case of full-term infants, it's just easier for the staff to have the cord cut early on. Some cords are so short you can't even place baby on mom's stomach after birth, let alone her chest. As for premature infants, the cord is quickly cut so they can get the newborn to a warmer to be assessed and possibly intubated. It's about convenience...not money. After a c-section the cord is immediately cut because what else can they do? There's no where to put baby and meanwhile they're held in midair, getting cold.
    The doctors do want to do what is easiest, but they're usually there 10-30 minutes after the birth anyway and I've seen them wait to cut the cord if parents request it. From the three L&D floors I've been on the placentas are either thrown out with the other bloody trash or put in formaldehyde, sent to the lab, and thrown away there (which I've seen by the way...there's no conspiracy). Quite frankly our doctors and staff are too busy and/or lazy to worry about the hospitals bottom line and what they do with the afterbirth.
    As a parent I have asked that my last two baby's cords be clamped after it has stopped pulsating. I didn't know to ask for it with my first. The problem with our nation's birthing system is convenience and tradition...not doctors cackling in corners just waiting to cut cords early.
  • Thomas Corriher
    Michelle, if you are going to present yourself as a medical insider and expert in these matters, then you really ought to list your full name and which hospital you work for. If you demand credibility and accountability from us, then you should provide the same. If you mean what you say, and say what you mean, then you should have no fear of standing out and identifying yourself. Otherwise, a large portion of our readers will assume that you are just another industry shill, and such suspicions have been well earned by people in your industry.

    For what it is worth, I personally believe you, and I believe that you are telling the truth as best you know it, and see it. I respect that. That doesn't necessarily mean that (in the general terms in which this article was written) that your statements are actually representative of the truth overall. Your statements do, however, likely represent what you, as an individual, have personally perceived in your experiences.

    Just because you have not seen it doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. It does happen, Michelle, and everyone should know about it. It is why we ran with this story.

    You may want to know that while we frequently attack "the establishment" for both its (sometimes intentional) blindness, and its gross corruption; we nevertheless know that the people manning the front-line trenches (like yourself) are often good-intentioned. A high percentage of nurses, in particular, are really noble people. Doctors, on the other hand, tend to be a different breed. There are some goods ones, but not many.

    About those "doctors cackling in corners". It usually doesn't happen that way; I agree. The cackling happens on the way to the bank.

    You were dead-wrong about one thing: there is nothing traditional about modern hospital child birthing. All of it is new, and part of experimental (not traditional) medicine; and the results are disastrous. What we write about is traditional medicine, and as a practicing nurse, you probably know absolutely nothing about it. In fact, you probably actually know less than nothing, because you spent years getting brainwashed to automatically discount everything "alternative", regardless of any scientifically observable cause and effect relationships to the contrary. You're in the Matrix, in other words, and there's a bigger and brighter world out there if you can ever unplug yourself.

    For more information about traditional birthing, see the following article.

    http://healthwyze.org/index.php/component/content/article/288-why-americans-ought-to-reevaluate-w...
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.


 

 

F.D.A. Disclaimer: The information provided by this site is intended to be a truthful, corrective alternative to the advice provided by your physician and other medical professionals.  If you have, or suspect that you have a serious health problem, then promptly contact a naturopathic doctor, who will have more training than your orthodox, allopathic doctor.  Additionally, we will help advise you if we can.  The information presented herein is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, and prevent disease.  Your orthodox physician is statistically about 9,000 times more deadly than the average gun owner, and has a 17% chance of killing one of his patients this year.
 

Who's Online

We have 130 guests and 1 member online

Advertisements

We are proud of the fact that we are not HONcode certified.

Berkey Water Filters from http://www.directive21.com/

The Rockefellers refuse to support our work, so it's up to you. You don't have to be a wealthy megalomaniac to make a difference. Small donations of just $5 add up to make a huge difference.

Utopia Silver Supplements

This is on par with the best silver available. If you call, tell Ben The Health Wyze Report Staff sent you.