The Inflammatory Topic of Vaccines During a Health Information War
| Written by Sarah Cain |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Catherine Bennett
As a reporter for The Guardian, she is courageously defending society from "vaccine dodgers" and alternative medicine. |
|
As a reporter for The Guardian, Catherine Bennett has been courageously defending society from "vaccine dodgers" and alternative medicine. In the British mainstream media, there has recently been enormous grandstanding about making the MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella) vaccine mandatory. Vaccinations have never been mandatory in Britain, because the public never believed that forced medicating was moral for a society. This is the reason why water has never been fluoridated in the United Kingdom.
One of our readers recently sent an article our way, entitled "It's time we created special schools for MMR dodgers". Dodgers? That article was an expression of a media agenda to associate those who forgo vaccines with cowards and traitors, instead of the better educated people that they actually are. Throughout the Guardian's article, insults are piled upon those who have dared to question the wisdom of vaccines, and it was insinuated that society would surely suffer a calamitous failure without more vaccines.
Bennett's article provided the revolutionary idea of separating unvaccinated children into quarantine schools for the protection of respectable society. Perhaps society should indeed separate the toxic, dumbed-down, pacified, and obedient families from the unpoisoned, healthy, vibrant, and creative ones, who are best poised to provide society leadership. Superior families would be pleased to send their children to these special schools knowing that their children would be surrounded by healthier peers, whose parents were equally well enough educated to act independently in the best interest of their families. Such parents would rest easier knowing that the risk of school violence would be extremely low, due to the unlikelihood of any of the children having been given violence-inducing SSRI anti-depressants, which by the way, have been involved in every school shooting in history. Parents could feel safer sending their kids to school if they were not going to be around kids who emit radiation due to cancer treatments. With this sort of school segregation, we could more easily test which kids score higher in tests, who gets sick the most often, and eventually; which ones are the most successful in the long term. We are able to predict which category of kids would grow up with the best capability to become the leaders of society, and which ones would simply become the drones to be forever condemned to a life of serfdom.
Instead of focusing on the MMR vaccine, Bennett branched out to ensure that all areas of alternative medicine were dismissed as unscientific. Attempting to provide evidence of the dangers of unvaccinated people, her article referenced a seventeen-year-old boy, who died of measles last year. Even with the resources of her major publication at her disposal, she still found only a single death amongst the unvaccinated. She neglected to mention how many more people were killed by lightning or meteors. Of course, she also never mentioned how many vaccinated people died of measles last year.
The reporter's arguments ignored the fact that the six studies that are routinely cited to promote vaccinations already have well-documented conflicts of interest. All of them were clearly shown to have a high risk of bias by Cochrane's scoring system. Bennet then boldly accused the famous study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield (the first one to confirm the MMR vaccine-autism link) of being flawed by a conflict of interest. There are many party-line studies in the U.S.A. and Canada, in which a verifiable official collusion with the vaccine makers was ignored, in lieu of assaulting Wakefield's professionalism. The dozens of self-serving studies made by the pharmaceutical industry happened long before the paradigm-shifting study by Andrew Wakefield ever made the news. Motive is a component of every crime, so we must ask who is most likely motivated to deceive us because they have something to hide. It is hardly Dr. Wakefield.
Below are findings from scientists and researchers concerning the six major pharmaceutically-sponsored pro-vaccine studies:
"The study demonstrates the difficulties of drawing inferences in the absence of a non-exposed population or a clearly defined causal hypothesis." (Re: Taylor 1999)
"The number and possible impact of biases in this study was so high that interpretation of the results is impossible." (Re: Fombonne 2001)
"The Retrospective Person-Time Cohort Study, by Makela, assessed the association between exposure to MMR and encephalitis (EN), aseptic meningitis (AM) and autism (AU) in a cohort of 535,544 Finnish children (95% of the surveillance cohort); the children were aged one to seven years at the time of vaccinations. The authors compared the incidence of disease in the first three months after vaccination with the incidence in the following months and years. They concluded that there was no evidence that vaccines had provided successful inoculation. The study was weakened by the loss of 14% of the original birth cohort, and the effects of the rather long time frame of follow up. What the impact of either of these factors was in terms of confounders is open to debate, however the long follow-up for autism was due to the lack of a properly constructed causal hypothesis..." (Re: Makela 2002)
"The interpretation of the study by Madsen was made difficult by the unequal length of follow-ups for younger cohort members, as well as the use of the date of diagnosis rather than onset of symptoms of autism." (Re: Madsen 2002)
"The conclusion, however, implied bias in the enrollment of cases which may not be representative of the rest of the autistic population of the city of Atlanta, USA where the study was set." (Re: DeStefano 2004)
"In the GPRD-based studies, (Black 2003; Smeeth 2004) the precise nature of controlled unexposed to MMR and their ability to generalize was impossible to determine... The study (Smeeth 2004) appeared carefully conducted and well reported, however, the GPRD-based MMR studies had no unexposed (to MMR) representative controls. In this study the approximately 4% to 13% seemed to be unexposed controls regarded by the authors as representative. Such a small number may indicate some bias in the selection of controls." (Re: Smeeth 2004)
Think Twice, The Global Vaccine Institute, provides truthful information about vaccine safety from an independent group of researchers.
The drug company that makes the MMR vaccine publishes an extensive list of warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions associated with this triple shot. It may be found in the vaccine package insert given to doctors administering MMR, and inside the Physician's Desk Reference (PDR)(8,9). However, this information is never given to patients or parents. The insert is quoted immediately below.
|
Since this article was written, the M.M.R. vaccine manufacturer has begun censoring autism from the package insert for its second version of the M.M.R. vaccine ("M.M.R. 2"). Most of the above indications continue to be cited, except for the admission of an autism link, which has been selectively removed. The vaccine manufacturer previously admitted to causing autism, but only in private communications with doctors. Their statements to the public and the media were the complete opposite. You may want to ask your doctor why he has been lying to you.
Parents in the British medical system are often ignored when they report problems with vaccines, because the doctors act as the gatekeepers. Parents cannot directly report bad reactions to regulators. They must instead go through their doctor, who may refuse in order to protect himself. Keep in mind that doctors in Britain get monetary bonuses for administering vaccines. How is that for a conflict of interest?
Examine the following graphs showing the incidence of U.S. disease deaths relative to when the vaccinations for those diseases appeared.
 |
Source: "The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline of Mortality in the United States in the Twentieth Century" by John B. McKinlay and Sonja M. McKinlay, 1977.
There is a somewhat inverse relationship in the graphs above. Notice that when the vaccines were implemented that the decreases in disease deaths actually slowed or stalled? Could this be accidental in an industry that is so well known for self-perpetuating itself, as the Guardian article is a great example of? We can see the evidence in the graphs above or in statistics that are freely available to the public.
This report will hopefully end some of the delusions that the allopathic medical establishment has had great scientific breakthroughs which brought about an end to diseases. Measles deaths declined 99.5% before vaccinations, so was it really the vaccine that saved us? Such numbers steer us to pondering if policy makers have been trying to recreate the measles epidemic by injecting the live virus into people at a time when they do not need it. Vaccines should be classified amongst the most toxic and dangerous medicine ever known. We exposed how the polio epidemic was essentially caused (not cured) by the medical establishment, in episode 4 of The Health Wyze Report (Audio Edition), and we explained the polio scam in even greater detail in issue #3 of Naturally Good Magazine. Both are freely available.
Related Articles
The Amish Don't Get Autism but They Do Get Bio-Terrorism
How To Cure Autism and The Time Bomb Of Mercury Poisoning
The 14 Studies Disputing A Mercury Link To Autism and Who Really Funded Them
The Health Wyze Report (Audio Edition #4)
Unwilling Guinea Pigs: Using Foster Care Children For Forced Drug Experiments
Mandatory Vaccinations: Have A Taste Of Your Own Medicine, Doctor
The Mail Bag #5: Colloidal Silver, Vaccines, Toothpaste, Sunlight, and Shark Cartilage
Proof That The Swine Flu Epidemic Was Man Made and Intentional
