Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She made a surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

"I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn't help but question why we need the vaccine at all."

-- Joan Robinson

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.

So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.) and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillain Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently -- sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.

"About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn't, and isn't treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer."

-- Dr. Diane Harper

One must understand how the establishment's word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of "science". When they report that untreated cases can lead to something that may lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do it nonetheless. There is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer.

From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own, so the chance of the vaccine actually saving an individual is about the same as the chance of him being struck by a meteorite. Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for symptom-less venereal diseases that their immune systems kill anyway? Moreover, why are parents not being told that the ingredients in the vaccine are more carcinogenic than the virus that the vaccine is intended to prevent? It harkens back to the 1950's, when doctors were promoting cigarette smoking as a means to obtain better lung health.

 

Related Articles

The Shaken Baby Syndrome Lie

The Amish Don't Get Autism but They Do Get Bio-Terrorism

How To Cure Autism and The Time Bomb Of Mercury Poisoning

The 14 Studies Disputing A Mercury Link To Autism and Who Really Funded Them

The Health Wyze Report (Audio Edition #4)

Vaccine Secrets

If Vaccines Are Safe, Then Why Did Congress Give Manufacturers Special Legal Immunity? Why Are They Above the Law?

Children's Programming On P.B.S. Is Admitted Propaganda For Vaccine Industry and Is Sponsored by Governmental Money

Chop Shop Hospitals

Unwilling Guinea Pigs: Using Foster Care Children For Forced Drug Experiments

Mandatory Vaccinations: Have A Taste Of Your Own Medicine, Doctor

The Hepatitis B Vaccine Scam

The Mail Bag #5: Colloidal Silver, Vaccines, Toothpaste, Sunlight, and Shark Cartilage

Proof That The Swine Flu Epidemic Was Man Made and Intentional

Health Wyze Dental Cleanser

Comments   

Julie Smith
# Julie Smith 2009-10-30 03:17
Hi I'm writing from New Zealand where I looked into Gardasil as we have a daughter. What I uncovered shocked me into setting up a website www.offtheradar.co.nz for other parents and girls to access information health officials won't be telling them.

Dr Diane Harper in a Radio New Zealand interview, back in August 2008, asked our Ministry of Health not to proceed with the "In Schools" vaccination programme here, for the reasons she is continuing to deliver as in your above article. Interestingly our government chose to ignore her credible pleas and chose to go ahead with the Gardasil vaccination of our 12 year old girls.

I have downloaded this interview and will be keeping it safe for when the day comes and the huge fallout from this totally unnecessary vaccine becomes apparent. Our government was forewarned which proves our girls health plays no part in why this vaccine is being pushed onto them.
Thomas Corriher (Managing Editor)
# RE: The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean: Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested Thomas Corriher (Managing Editor) 2009-11-16 10:24
That site is well done. We would like a copy of that interview, especially if it is in English.

Are vaccines mandatory there? Some of our vaccinations are called "mandatory", but virtually every state has legal exceptions that parents can use to protect their children from vaccinations. For instance, our state (North Carolina), allows for religious exceptions, so a parent needs to only declare that they believe it is unchristian to do that to their child, in order to be protected. Of course, it is the truth. It really is unchristian to do that to a child.
Ralph Fucetola
# Peitioning the FDA for Redress of Grievances Ralph Fucetola 2010-12-23 08:57
We've mailed a formal Petition to the FDA regarding holding drug company CEOs responsible for vaccines adverse reactions with regard to the flu vax:

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=7418

In addition to the other formal Petitions we’ve filed before the FDA and FTC, we have prepared and have mailed the Petition, demanding that FDA enforce the law against false vaccine labeling. The Petition makes reference to a 1975 United States Supreme Court doctrine, the Park Doctrine (which arises from a case in which the president of a major corporation, Park, was held responsible for the safety failings of the people he supervised).

This important doctrine would have been effectively repealed in 2010 by the “criminalization of speech about food” bill, S.3067 which did not get added to the food control bill; rejected by Congress… because of mass public PUSH BACK.
Mindano Iha
# Mindano Iha 2011-07-02 14:51
“Replacement” is a normal phenomenon in which virus strains which have been removed by a vaccine are always replaced by new strains. Gardasil is marketed to prevent cancer.
However, the opposite may occur:

It is not known by anybody whether the new strains will be more carcinogenic than the ones which have been removed.

In other words, Gardasil may actually increase the risk of cancer.
Sandra Dayton
# Gardasil Sandra Dayton 2013-03-15 11:53
Does anyone have any more information about the seizure side effects? My daughter had this vaccination and in November 2012 began unexplainable seizures. We have been to the hospital three times and are currently going to see a second neurologist and so far no diagnosis. Any help with information about this would be great.
Christina Waldman
# Christina Waldman 2013-06-27 22:52
Did you guys see this? July Wileyman,"HPV vaccination programs have not been shown to be cost effective in countries with comprehensive Pap screening and surgery," Infectious Agents and Cancer 2013, 8:21
http://www.infectagentscancer.com/content/pdf/1750-9378-8-21.pdf (provisional pdf; Media and Communication, University of Wollongong (UOW) School of Social Sciences, Wollongong, Australia).

You must log in or register to post comments.

The Claimer: The information provided herein is intended to be a truthful and corrective alternative to the advice that is provided by physicians and other medical professionals. It is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, and prevent disease.