The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested

Hi I'm writing from New Zealand where I looked into Gardasil as we have a daughter. What I uncovered shocked me into setting up a website www.offtheradar.co.nz for other parents and girls to access information health officials won't be telling them.

Dr Diane Harper in a Radio New Zealand interview, back in August 2008, asked our Ministry of Health not to proceed with the "In Schools" vaccination programme here, for the reasons she is continuing to deliver as in your above article. Interestingly our government chose to ignore her credible pleas and chose to go ahead with the Gardasil vaccination of our 12 year old girls.

I have downloaded this interview and will be keeping it safe for when the day comes and the huge fallout from this totally unnecessary vaccine becomes apparent. Our government was forewarned which proves our girls health plays no part in why this vaccine is being pushed onto them.

That site is well done. We would like a copy of that interview, especially if it is in English.

Are vaccines mandatory there? Some of our vaccinations are called "mandatory", but virtually every State has legal exceptions that parents can use to protect their children from vaccinations. For instance, our State (North Carolina), allows for religious exceptions, so a parent needs to only state that they believe it is unchristian to do that to their child, in order to be protected. Of course, it is the truth. It really is unchristian to do that to a child.

There is a little bit of misinformation in this post. Dr Harper's point is that although the vaccine does help, the incidence of serious side effects may actually be greater than the incidence of cervical cancers (12,000/year in the US). Additionally, there are other avenues to treat and even stop the cancer from even occurring. Hence the point she was making is that deciding whether to vaccinate or not is not an easy call. Note that things would be different if incidence of cervical cancer was greater or if the vaccine was shown to have fewer side effects.

We agree that the vaccine does more harm to people than good, so where exactly is the misinformation? Moreover, you are suggesting that women are no more valuable than statistics, because it would be okay to harm some of them if only there were a better help-to-harm ratio. That's not okay. It's never okay to knowingly harm people with something (while calling it "medicine"), even if a larger group of people would be helped. That's what flies for "medical ethics" nowadays, and it is no ethics at all. It's flat-out evil.

Real medicine involves treating individuals as human beings whose welfare matters. It's not poising them, and then patting yourself on the back for winning a numbers game. Saying "But it's science!", as you people so love to do, doesn't make it okay either. We've never given any of you people permission to experiment upon us for the sake of your own glory.

I'm giving Steven here a 90% chance of working for the establishment. Steven, I recommend the HonCode websites for you, where you should feel right at home.

The first rule of medicine is supposed to be 'first do no harm'.

How refreshing, someone in Big Pharm finally grew a conscience. Let's hope & pray more of this will keep happening!

We've mailed a formal Petition to the FDA regarding holding drug company CEOs responsible for vaccines adverse reactions with regard to the flu vax:

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=7418

In addition to the other formal Petitions we’ve filed before the FDA and FTC, we have prepared and have mailed the Petition, demanding that FDA enforce the law against false vaccine labeling. The Petition makes reference to a 1975 United States Supreme Court doctrine, the Park Doctrine (which arises from a case in which the president of a major corporation, Park, was held responsible for the safety failings of the people he supervised).

This important doctrine would have been effectively repealed in 2010 by the “criminalization of speech about food” bill, S.3067 which did not get added to the food control bill; rejected by Congress… because of mass public PUSH BACK.

“Replacement” is a normal phenomenon in which virus strains which have been removed by a vaccine are always replaced by new strains. Gardasil is marketed to prevent cancer.
However, the opposite may occur:

It is not known by anybody whether the new strains will be more carcinogenic than the ones which have been removed.

In other words, Gardasil may actually increase the risk of cancer.

What about the rabies and tetanus vaccines? While I was in the hospital after suffering from a head injury, they convinced me into getting a tetanus shot as a precautionary measure, even after I said I didn't think the item that hit me was rusty. And in the cases of rabies, I've always assumed that it's mandatory that if you get bit by a bat or dog, you must get a rabies shot. Is this different than the usual vaccines?

Does anyone have any more information about the seizure side effects? My daughter had this vaccination and in November 2012 began unexplainable seizures. We have been to the hospital three times and are currently going to see a second neurologist and so far no diagnosis. Any help with information about this would be great.