|
Written by Sarah Cain
Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:46
|
|
Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines; but instead, she unexpectedly turned on her corporate bosses, in a very public way.
When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.
“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.”
-- Joan Robinson
Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in this country is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any affect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.
Additionally, there was the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being recommended to, and marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects for Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and that is just for the small percentage of people who went through the hassle of reporting them. So far, 44 girls are officially known to have died, needlessly, from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently -- sometimes causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.
Dr. Harper claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.
“About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.”
-- Dr. Diane Harper
You have to understand how the establishment's word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote. You have to understand their unique version of "science", in other words. When they say that untreated cases "can" lead to something that "may" then lead to cervical cancer, it really means that this relationship is merely a hypothesis perpetuated by the pharmaceutical companies, and that there is no clear relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the related conditions supposedly may cause under specific and uncommon conditions. In the same vein, drinking apple juice may give a person the ability to levitate if it can alter the laws of physics. It's not exactly what we call science. It's F.D.A. science. By the way, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 of a specific venereal disease, so the chance of it helping any individual is about about the same as that person being struck by a meteorite.
Why exactly do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system kills anyway?
Whether her speech will be able to change the current mass vaccination of young girls is so far unknown, but we hope so. These inoculations are little more than hype, with no safety testing for the recommended age group, and having risks that are still being discovered the hard way.
If we had a whistle blower award, Dr. Diane Harper would easily be our winner for 2009. Thank you, Dr. Harper, for doing the right thing. We have hundreds of health care professionals who read this site, and we ask you people to offer Dr. Harper a job. She is probably going to be available sometime soon.
, even if a larger group of people would be helped. That's what flies for "medical ethics" nowadays, and it is no ethics at all. It's flat-out evil.
