|Demonstrating the principles of modern medical science.|
Guess which is less deadly statistically: cigarettes or pharmaceuticals? How about this one? Which is more likely to cause deadly cancers: cigarettes, or standard radioactive cancer screens such as mammograms? The next one is even better. Sunscreens (not sunlight) cause skin cancer, and this is why people exposed to more sunlight tend to have more skin cancers -- because they heavily use sunscreens laden with carcinogens. Life-giving sunlight produces vitamin D3 in our skin (removing excess cholesterol in the process), and this natural vitamin D3 eliminates approximately 70% of cancers in 17 categories. Exposing the mythology of modern medicine demonstrates how the chemical industry, the medical establishment, and our media all work together to cook their science.
CNN recently ran a report titled, Ginger May Help Chemo Patients With Nausea. This apparently means that modern medicine (allopathy) discovered that ginger is useful in 2009. This is especially underwhelming for people knowledgeable about traditional medicines, because they have already known this for... what... 4,000 years and counting. I never cease to be underwhelmed by what allopathic medicine offers us. The ginger revelation was supposedly news, because establishment doctors "discovered" and "proved" that ginger was useful, in 2009 no less.
Perhaps ginger's effects were never "discovered" before now because it cannot be monopolized by the pharmaceutical cartel, and thus it cannot be "regulated" out of our control. With all the backlash against chemotherapy now, perhaps they felt that they had better throw us a bone to keep the restless natives at bay. However, in their typical propagandizing fashion, they just could not leave it at that. They have been running their cons so long that they just cannot stop themselves.
Now, let's look at the information from a couple of related CNN health articles, and let the games begin!
"The death rate due to cancer has declined in the United States in recent years, largely due to better prevention and treatment."
Actually, the drop in cancer rates is because of people in our community, who are freeing people from their doctors, and encouraging them to take control of their health. A good example of our work is the explosion of the organic produce industry, which strangely enough is not being encouraged by the medical industry.
"It's great news that a large chunk of the decreased death rates in women can be attributed to breast cancer. This is largely due to a decreased use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which has been shown to increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer."
I agree. At least they admit to causing cancers with their beneficial treatments.
"Fewer women are getting mammography and that's why fewer women are getting diagnosed with breast cancer..."
Now that's what I'm talking about! That was smooth. Did you miss it? The whole truth is that the radiation from mammograms cause cancers, so whenever less women get mammograms, then less women likewise get cancers. The breast cancer that is detected this year was usually caused by last year's "preventative" mammogram. Underarm antiperspirant is another major contributing factor, but they will never mention that either, because that too hurts business.
"Fat brings on puberty earlier and early puberty is a risk factor for breast cancer..."
Huh? Fatness is the cause of puberty? Both the obesity and early puberty epidemics are proven to be in large part due to the non-organic, corn-fed, high-fat meats that are laced with trash from the chemical industry, such as toxic nitrate salts, and in particular, the pharmaceutical industry's own synthetic growth hormones. Again, only a portion of the truth is told, in order to protect themselves, their regulatory buddies, and their corporate partners, at our expense. Natural fats from range-feed organic farm animals, and fats from natural sources like butter are absolutely harmless, unless they are consumed in extremes. Which reminds me, that whole fats and cholesterol thing is a lie too, but there is just not enough time and space to go into that topic. Just so you know, the chemical industry's hydrogenated fats and their so-called "healthy cooking oils", which they have been promoting, are the real reason why the business of cardiology is booming.
Just consider your doctor to be a business man, and then suddenly it all makes sense.
" ... researchers found that a smidgen of purified ginger given in supplement form (equivalent to one-quarter teaspoon to one-half teaspoon of the spice each day) could reduce chemotherapy-related nausea by 40 percent on the first day of treatment when used in combination with traditional anti-nausea medications."
Notice how they call their patented chemical-industry drugs as "traditional" medications? It's incredible. We know they are safe and effective that way (wink, wink). Supposedly ginger is useful when combined with more "traditional" medicines. Since it is labeled to be non-traditional, are we to believe that ginger is really a new and experimental drug? Perhaps it was when Moses used it. It is just another back-handed slap against alternative therapies, concerning the use of herbs such as ginger, but moreover, they used this whole situation to promote the value of their "traditional" drugs. On one hand, ginger gets the credit, and when we are not looking, they also throw-out that ginger must be combined with "traditional" pharmaceuticals; since it is to be taken for granted that the "traditional" pharmaceuticals may be used alone, but ginger is just too dangerous. Is this more of their games, or it is just physically impossible for them to really acknowledge the impotence of chemical warfare posing as medicine?
What is really sad is the broken premises upon which their arguments were framed. Let's examine them. They claimed that chemotherapy is more bearable with ginger, so ginger is suddenly being medically approved to encourage the use of chemotherapy. This is totally sick on so many levels. Of course, herbal medicine is being kept in its place, as merely "complementary" for treating the symptoms of the poisons, which are themselves only being used to treat the symptom of cancer (tumors) -- instead of treating the cancer itself. The whole affair is a complete mockery of medicine, and an insult to alternative practitioners. They never learn, or perhaps it is simply too unprofitable for them to learn. For those of us in-the-know, the patronizing platitudes about ginger having a place in medicine (just above shaman chants) is hardly reassuring that these people are likely to change anytime soon.