It is near sacrilege to publish anything that in any way defends smokers. Brace yourself, for you are about to read such a sacrilege. For the sake of political correctness, let us preface by noting that smokers are hellishly evil creatures, for they savagely murder our innocent children with their second-hand death gas. Now we can move on with political correctness satisfied.

As a collective society, we have come to view anything tobacco-related as evil, and its users as needing to be stoned (in the biblical sense). Because of the almost religious anti-tobacco dogma nowadays, what follows might be difficult for some readers to believe.

The first smokers were the American Indians. They also used cannabis (marijuana), which was a favorite choice inside peace pipes. For hundreds, if not thousands of years, the American Indians frequently smoked unfiltered and organic tobaccos, wherein the smoke was stronger than any cigarette sold now. The Indians did not get lung cancers. They suffered from no major diseases at all. They did not even suffer from allergies, despite living outdoors constantly. It is similar to the situation with the modern-day, unvaccinated Amish. It was not until the English and the Europeans began importing the European diets, long-term food storage, and the overall European lifestyle that serious diseases appeared in Indian tribes. The Old World diseases struck with an ugly vengeance. Entire tribes were wiped-out in days, because the Indians had never needed to develop an immunity against European pathogens.

No Indian was ever killed by tobacco before modern cigarette processing became normal. Our modern killer-tobacco is not the same tobacco that was smoked by our forefathers around camp fires. As an interesting aside, there still have been no deaths attributed to marijuana, ever. If marijuana were regulated and 'enhanced' by the same chemical industry partners and governmental regulators that manage our cigarettes, foods, and drugs, then marijuana would become cancerous too. The pharmaceutical industry would not tolerate safe marijuana any more than it tolerates safe cigarettes. Marijuana is actually a greater threat, because it has potent medicinal qualities, and that is why the public must be made to fear it.

Like our foods and medicines, modern tobacco is 'enhanced' by the chemical industry, and now our foods, medicines, and even tobaccos comprise an unholy trinity of death. In modern cigarette smoke, the chemical compounds outnumber the tobacco compounds over 100-to-1. Every one of these intentionally added chemicals is toxic and most of them are carcinogenic. There is some truth to the belief that most (if not all) tobacco companies are evil, because what they do to their own customers is truly evil. None of it is necessary. We are frankly baffled by the insanity of it all. Cigarettes, like medicines and foods, do not need to be poisoned, but all of them tend to be quite toxic in this era, thanks to adulterations.

Fire Safe Cigarettes

It is getting much worse for smokers in America. Since January of 2010, in 49 out of the 50 states, there has been a legal requirement that a much worse poison be added to all cigarettes. The new state laws require that cigarette manufacturers poison smokers with something worse than we have seen before, like a state-mandated genocide against smokers. Please have the compassion to help us get the message out, even if you personally despise smoking and smokers. It is the right thing to do.

Cigarettes now must contain ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer, which is literally carpet glue. It is known to cause tumors in mice, but inhalation of its smoke has never been tested on humans. The Material Safety Data Sheet for this substance notes that it produces toxic fumes when exposed to fire. The new "fire safe" cigarettes are made with 3 layers of paper, which requires triple the glue of past cigarettes. They contain what are referred to as "speed bumps" (made from carpet glue) all the way down the shaft. These are designed to reduce oxygen flow, so that the cigarette will quickly extinguish if nobody is inhaling it. This often puts the cigarette out too early, causing the smoker to re-ignite several times throughout a cigarette. It forces smokers to inhale more deeply and more frequently than they otherwise would, whilst they smoke a considerably more toxic cigarette. We call this deadly by design.

Activists have been campaigning for decades to get tobacco companies to remove toxic substances from cigarettes, such as citrates, phosphates, and calcium carbonate; which are added to ensure that cigarettes do not self-extinguish. Instead of just removing these burn accelerators, tobacco companies instead added carpet glue. Their logic for appeasing law-makers is hopelessly flawed. Newspaper articles which blame victims for cigarette-induced fires with headlines like "House Burned Down by Reckless Cigarette Use" neglect to mention the fact that cigarettes contain burn accelerators, which should rightly place the blame on the manufacturers. These fire-accelerating chemicals incredibly remain inside the "fire safe cigarettes". It is a similar situation to what we witnessed with the pharmaceutical industry, in which new chemicals are needed to eliminate the side-effects of the chemicals that they provided originally, as a way of avoiding an admission of guilt.

The Genocidal Politics of Tobacco

No studies have ever been done on cigarettes containing pure, organic tobacco, because such a test might actually prove it to be safe in moderation. Such a finding would not be politically correct 'science'. It would be on-par with questioning Darwinism, and it would destroy careers.

Most anti-tobacco groups are opposed to any sort of harm reduction, such as additive-free or organically-grown tobacco, because they are funded by pharmaceutical and chemical companies. We have witnessed these organizations speak out against safe tobacco again and again, so their concern for the public's health is entirely fictitious. These companies profit from drugs and patches that are alleged to help smokers break their addiction. Those who are unable to quit smoking, or simply do not wish to, are forced to smoke needlessly toxic cigarettes. The F.D.A. likewise involves itself in this genocidal campaign by blocking all natural products that aid with smoking cessation, like it did with (non-addictive) Indian tobacco, for example.

Despite all of the campaigns that have been led by politicians who talk about how they are "getting tough" on Big Tobacco, no labeling is yet required for the additives that actually make cigarettes dangerous. Once again, it is the victims, not the chemical industry, that are blamed for the carnage. Smokers are unaware that hundreds of chemical compounds are added to most cigarettes. Even fewer have been told that they are legally required to inhale the fumes of burning carpet glue whenever they smoke.

A study by the Harvard School of Health revealed that tar, carbon monoxide, and naphthalene levels were higher in the new fire safe cigarettes. In fact, according to their study, every chemical, except nicotine, was higher in fire-safe cigarettes. Despite the alarming results, the study's conclusions were actually biased toward promoting fire-safe cigarettes. We can empathize with their good intentions, but this cure is obviously worse than the disease. If the agenda is truly innocent, then why have these 'improved' cigarettes never been reported to the public? Why has there been a media black-out?

Naphthalene is an insecticide and a byproduct of the coal tar industry. It is also a core part of the new "safe cigarettes". Exposure to high amounts of naphthalene can result in irreversible damage to the eyes and liver, according to the E.P.A. It is also a carcinogen, particularly through inhalation exposure. Symptoms of acute exposure include headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, confusion, anemia, jaundice, convulsions, and coma. It can also cause neurological effects in infants. Thus, it is easy to conclude that normal cigarettes are actually safer than their 'safe' counterparts. These are the effects of just a single chemical. An investigation into the effects of every chemical that is added to modern cigarettes would require a book of its own.

If all of this were not damning enough, these "fire safe cigarettes" are not truly fire safe. In one final move to alleviate themselves from any sort of liability, the cigarette companies admit on their websites that "no cigarette is fire safe". The legislation was supposedly enacted for the purpose of stopping fires, but the very initials that are found on these cigarette packets (FSC) promote a false sense of security that is prone to causing more fires. Even with the misnomer of increased safety, victims may not necessarily be able to sue manufacturers if the cigarettes cause a fire. Even with the existence of their chemical burn accelerators, the corporate lawyers will predictably contend that the addition of carpet glue was a good faith effort to ensure safety, and therefore fires will still be blamed on smokers.

Legislation mandating the sale of only fire-safe cigarettes first went into effect on January 1st, 2010, for certain states. We have heard dozens of reports about the health issues that are being caused by these cigarettes, which seem to mimic the symptoms of naphthalene exposure. All fire safe cigarettes must be labeled on the box. Usually found around the bar code, the letters FSC mean Fire Safety Compliant.

Some smokers choose the American Spirit brand of organic cigarettes, but these are also "fire safe". This company uses organic tobacco, but the glue-coated paper is far from organic. The only way for most American smokers to avoid fire safe cigarettes is for them to roll their own, or to purchase them online from foreign countries. As with all things, organic is of higher quality and safer.

Radioactive Cigarettes

In order to grow what the tobacco industry calls "more flavorful" tobacco, farmers use high-phosphate fertilizers. The phosphate is taken from a rock mineral called apatite, which is ground into a powder and dissolved by sulfuric acid. Hydrogen fluoride is produced as a byproduct of this process, which is then integrated into U.S. drinking water and toothpastes. Apatite rock contains radium and other radioactive elements, such as lead 210, and polonium 210. Due to these fertilizers, radioactive compounds enter the tobacco through the roots, and from direct contact with the leaves. When a smoker inhales apatite-ridden smoke, radioactive particles enter his lungs, which causes radiation poisoning and possibly lung cancer.

"Uranium has a very long half-life and will accumulate in the soil with repeated applications of fertilizer. As a result, modern cigarettes may contain higher levels of Po-210 than those measured 40 years ago."

-- The Big Idea: Polonium, Radon and Cigarettes, The Royal Society of Medicine

The University of Massachusetts wrote to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1982, warning that a person smoking one and a half packs of cigarettes per day would be exposed to a radiation dose in certain areas of the lung at 8,000 mrem per year, which is the equivalent of 300 chest x-rays per year. It has been theorized that the amount of radiation is much greater now than it was when these tests were completed. The only way to avoid this radiation is to use organically-grown tobacco. "All natural" and additive-free tobacco may still be radioactive.


List of Ingredients, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

The Effect Of The New York State Cigarette Fire Safety Standard On Ignition Propensity Smoke Toxicity And The Consumer Market, Harvard School of Public Health

Health Effects Notebook for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Environmental Protection Agency

The Big Idea: Polonium Radon and Cigarettes, The Royal Society of Medicine


Related Articles

Smoking To Cure Lung Infections and For Good Lung Health

The Potent and Natural Painkillers That Are Still Legal

The Amish Don't Get Autism but They Do Get Bio-Terrorism

Salvia Divinorum: Exposing the Power of Alternative Herbal Medicines and The People Who are Threatened by Them


Mark Schaft
# Mark Schaft 2010-01-21 16:10
You guys have balls of steel. I did not expect you to actually publish an article which condoned smoking, even indirectly. It was a very honest article though, so well done for having the courage to print it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Judith Wilhelm
# FSC and the genocide agnst smokersJudith Wilhelm 2011-01-19 19:04
Dear Mark,
The article did not "condone" cigarette smoking, but merely gave an accurate unbiased report of the facts. My grandfather smoked a pipe and lived to be 100 years old. That tells me it may even be good for us! Still I would not recommend it to anyone. Anymore than I would recommend someone drink coffee or eat ice cream! Our battle is to stop the coporations and governments from ruining everything on this planet. God gave us free will and choice, but we have allowed "demons" to take over the world in the form of chemical corporations and political cronies!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Judith Wilhelm
# FSC - the newest way for the govt. to "kill the poJudith Wilhelm 2011-01-19 18:57
I totally agree with your article. I have smoked since I was 11 years old and am now 50. For the past year - and 3 mnths before I knew what had happened - I started having fits of coughing and -for the first time in my life- I have pain moving through my body. It started at my neck. My arms are suffering from nerve type pain issues. I am a dance and Yoga instructor. I love vegetarian food, fitness, meditation, doing good - and yes I am an evil smoker! I am rolling my own!Please contact me if you need my voice.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Bambi Viacello
# This is THE TRUTH i ve done my homework for 3 yrBambi Viacello 2011-11-18 07:15
SMOKER'S, ARE FSC CIGARETTES MAKING YOU SICK? Jeffrey Wigand's agenda, post "The Insider", is working closely with the FDA who have full control over tobacco. When I asked him personally (recently)about all the FSC cigarette illnesses, he denied knowing anything about it. That's funny, two years earlier in an e-mail I sent him that HE responded to, he thanked me for bringing the FSC cigarette illnesses to his attention and that he would personally notify Dr. L a w r e n c e D e y t o n (HEAD LIAR @ FDA TOBACCO DIVISION). Wigand is a LIAR and is in bed with the FDA who are deliberately lacing cigarettes with new FSC chemicals to induce unorthodox illnesses to coerce smokers into quitting. Smokers in other countries are NOT experiencing this. WIGAND, the FDA and "Angel of Death" LAWRENCE DEYTON are EVIL NAZI bastards and should be convicted of crimes against American citizens. Kathleen Sebelius is also in on this. The needle is too good for these filthy scumbags.

Note: This comment was slightly edited by the staff due to technical problems.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Bambi Viacello
# Bambi Viacello 2011-11-18 07:18
The FDA is the organization that needs to be POUNDED with complaints. Calling OUT DR. Lawrence DEYTON is the key. It will take thousands of calls and emails these people do nothing unless it is huge they totally know about FSC but act as if they have only kind of heard of it they are lying the fda phone number is 877 287 1373 also politicians at the state and federal level must be held accountable for this evil shit
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
KElla Walker
# Interested in FeedbackKElla Walker 2011-11-28 19:46
I would appreciate any feedback, if there is any, regarding physical/neurological symptoms after smoking FSC cigarettes.

I began smoking 2 years ago, just as the cigarette industry was making their shift to FSC cigarettes. I noted, for several months, that when I would smoke (usually the first cigarettes of the day) that my entire scalp would be overcome with a "flush" of tingles and that oftentimes, the muscles of the left side of my face would feel tightened and drawn upwards. Other times, my hands and arms would shake so hard that I could not control them well enough to dial a telephone. These effects lasted just minutes and eventually, dissipated entirely. However, I was also plagued by a rash on my arms and palms of my hands - oftentimes quite itchy - that I attributed to an allergic reaction to menthol.

I DO have a Latex allergy - which I eventually was told was part of the chemical make-up of FSC cigarettes.

Eventually, all of the symptoms mentioned dissipated. I smoked for 2 years and then quit. I developed a nasty "smoker's cough" almost from the outset and definitely noted an overall loss of energy.

The month I quit smoking, I was suddenly overcome with extreme fatigue, followed by simultaneous left leg and left arm weakness. It lasted about a week, then recurred one time each of the following two months. I had a BRAIN MRI to rule out MS and it shows a single, 15mm lesion on my brain - but is not yet indicative of "true" MS. The weeks following my MRI, I've been suffering from a cascade of food allergies. One of the foods I tested positive for is in the same family as tobacco...but now that we think about this, we are curious if this whole mess isn't totally related to FSC/tobacco allergy.

Any thoughts??
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Harry Stein
# MEDIA IS THE KEYHarry Stein 2012-02-01 03:25
The bottom line is full and total exposure. Not one TV program has been aired on this subjuect. I've tried but no luck. I encourage ALL smokers to try and call or email guys like Bill O'Reilly, John Stossel, Greg Gutfeld. Yes, these guys are all conservatives on Fox. I believe that these people believe that YOU the smoker have the right to make your own decisions. Liberals on the other hand are the ones pointing their pious fingers at us. Someone that has a huge audience will at least put it out there. The internet is falling on deaf ears and the petition site mentioned above was closed. Probably by the government. Buying cigarettes from overseas is nearly impossible because of all the new laws that the FDA and Obama appointed CZAR Dr. Lawrence Deyton have over the internet. We are truly living in dangerous times. Our Civil Liberties are being stripped from us by a government that wants to take care of us little helpless children. I'm waiting for them to start outlawing certain sports because of the dangers of injury. Unfrigginbelievable.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
John Rochet
# Cleansing the FDAJohn Rochet 2012-04-25 16:35
Sounds like a long range sharp shooter is needed to send a message. Any takers?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Rose Marie
# Rose Marie 2012-07-25 17:42
Why do you state that smokers are hellishly evil people? I would like to forward this article to friends but hesitate because of this harsh judgement against them. Or am I somehow misinterpretting your message? Thanks.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher)
# Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher) 2012-07-26 02:54
That was sarcasm based upon the way that smokers are now presented by the mainstream media. We would not have provided this information if we felt that smokers were evil. The article explains that there is an almost religious anti-tobacco dogma nowadays, and that it is unwarranted.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Tony Hedberg
# FSC Is Killing Me.Tony Hedberg 2013-03-12 13:30
Don't worry folks! I'm sure that the great and wonderful pharmaceutical companies will soon come up with a "new", exciting drug that will counter the negative effects of smoking FSC cigarettes. Of course, you'll have to take out a second mortgage on your life just to be able to afford it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Juliana Ferris
# detox from FSC chemicalsJuliana Ferris 2014-01-13 02:28
I have been smoking American Spirit Organic. I had heard about the bad chemicals now added to the paper, I tried to learn to roll my own, I bought organic tobacco, cotton filters and papers. It takes a lot of research. And a rolling machine, but I can't get the knack of using it either. I gave up on trying to roll my own. I have been getting sicker and newly this summer I developed eczema. Is there any way to detox these horrible chemicals from FSC cigarettes out of the body?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Juliana Ferris
# Juliana Ferris 2014-01-14 19:57
Can I start an online petition using text from this article? I need to figure out also the best people to petition, I am guessing the FDA is one.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher)
# Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher) 2014-01-15 18:35
You are quite welcome to. We simply ask that wherever people republish our articles, we be given credit with a link back to the original.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Mark Frank
# Heart AttackMark Frank 2017-11-15 11:15
TWICE now I have thought I was having a heart attack after smoking FSC's. TWICE now I have run up one hell of a bill for the insurance company and the VA. And TWICE now I have got that condescending speech of 'you just need to quit smoking'.

I roll my own (American Spirit Organic with tubes) and have zero problems in the heart department. But all it takes is one night at the casino on a commercial pack - and I'm in trouble.

I jut got off the phone with my doc's nurse. I told her about the FSC. And, like drinking and sex, the world is NOT going to stop smoking. And while she agreed, she noted that if we could get care to the mentally ill sooner and faster, maybe there wouldn't be the mass killings. And maybe a frog wouldn't bump his butt when he jumps if he only had wings.

It was the Fire Marshall's in led this masquerade of FSC - all under the guise of 'saving the children'. Yet since 2012 - the number of kids killed in fires has remained virtually unchanged. FSC did nothing buy line somebody's pockets with mo' dough!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Anthony Bode
# keep it real !!!Anthony Bode 2019-02-26 00:48
I have been smoking since I was 13yrs old,my parents both smoked,and it was quite socially accepted back in the 70s,not everyone likes to smoke,but the people that do should not be treated like 2nd hand Citizens,we are connected to the plant world,as a lot of people don't realise,if any plants are adulterated,why would they be better for us ???,money is the only reason,that the Corporates benefit from this,the German scientists brought back to the USA,after the Second World War,this is what started the Pharmaceutical Company,Nasa, get the Picture,We are being Targeted,just like Cell ph users,Stay Vigilant.......Anthony
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote

Add comment

The Claimer: The information provided herein is intended to be a truthful and corrective alternative to the advice that is provided by physicians and other medical professionals. It is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, and prevent disease.