Are you still walking for the cure? That money you're raising is the reason why they'll never find it.

While researching the use of alternative therapies that were utilized by Suzanne Somers, we came across doctors and media outlets who desperately tried to malign her reputation. Their responses were so hasty that they accidentally revealed statistics that are not normally shared with the public.

"We're finding that about 25 to 30 percent of some cancers stop growing at some point, that can make some treatments look good that aren't doing anything. Until doctors figure out how to identify which patients have cancers that won't progress, the only option is to treat everyone."

-- Dr. Otis Brawley, American Cancer Society's Chief Medical Officer

While some people might consider 25 to 30 percent to be a relatively low percentage, this is actually much higher than the success rate for chemotherapy. The true life-long cure rate bounces between 2 and 4 percent for orthodox treatments. When compared, 30% suddenly becomes a very impressive figure with a gain of 10 times. Of course, this number speaks only for those who supposedly get no treatments at all. Alternative therapies get better life-long cure rates than 30%, but these numbers are not discussed publicly by medical officials, and rarely in private. Why aren't these figures ever given to patients who are diagnosed with cancer? Why are they instead told the lie that they will certainly die if they refuse chemotherapy and radiation when almost the opposite is true?

We have searched tirelessly for the success rates of those who decided to walk away from all treatments for several years, but we only found it when the American Cancer Society stumbled in its attempts to defend its bruised reputation from meekly Suzanne Somers. Why didn't they publicly release those numbers before? The recovery of Suzanne Somers was obviously quite embarrassing for them, because not only is she one of many who has cured herself of cancer permanently (not just 5 years of survival) but she also went public about her experiences with alternative treatments. Had she religiously followed the orthodox therapies, she would have had a 96% chance of not being alive, and her protracted death would have been truly horrific.

The quotation cited earlier makes another interesting point. Doctors really have no clue which cancers will progress, and which ones will not. Therefore, we must ask if early testing is really a good idea. With early testing, not only do the tests actually stimulate cancers through radiation, cutting, and poisoning, but doctors frequently discover anomalies that would otherwise naturally disappear if left alone. They always treat those abnormalities, and the patients almost always die from the treatments. People nowadays die from the treatments instead of the cancers, and this is shown in the establishment's own statistics. Whenever a body is exposed to chemotherapy, cancers will strike sooner or later regardless of whether they existed initially. All chemotherapy drugs are carcinogenic, and they weaken all healthy cells. This is admitted in the official literature for adverse effects for all of the so-called anti-cancer medications, and massive cellular destruction is officially a part of standard treatments by design. They claim that their medicines attack the weaker cancer cells, but they actually do that by attacking all of the cells, and thereby the very immune system that is so critical for recovery.

"Call it the arrow of cancer. Like the arrow of time, it was supposed to point in one direction. Cancers grew and worsened. But as a paper in The Journal of the American Medical Association noted last week, data from more than two decades of screening for breast and prostate cancer call that view into question. Besides finding tumors that would be lethal if left untreated, screening appears to be finding many small tumors that would not be a problem if they were left alone, undiscovered by screening. They were destined to stop growing on their own or shrink, or even, at least in the case of some breast cancers, disappear."

-- Gina Kolata, the New York Times, October 26, 2009

The success rate of curing cancer is not going to rise much in orthodox medicine, because it is unwilling to consider any less profitable methodologies. A rise in orthodox cancer treatment success rates would indicate that their methods of calculating cure rates have changed, not the actual survival rates. It is how the science of modern medicine is cooked. Barely surviving for 5 years is currently counted as a successful cure, but patients usually die between the 5 and 10 year mark. It is called "cooking the books" in accounting circles. Most people are shocked when they learn that those who die during drug trials are censored from the records, because the departed did not "complete the study". Getting killed in an experimental drug trial actually helps a drug company's chance of getting that drug approved, because those who get the sickest are not counted.

"Success of most chemotherapies is appalling... There is no scientific evidence for its ability to extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancer... Chemotherapy for malignancies too advanced for surgery, which accounts for 80% of all cancers, is a scientific wasteland."

-- Dr. Uhlrich Abel

If the cancer industry were really concerned about scientific progress, then it would not hide its own statistics. Truth does not fear investigation. Instead, its numbers are repeatedly covered up, and the scientific community eliminates from its ranks anyone who refuses to accept the establishment's zealous dogma. It is not science. It is politics, and a very deadly form of it.

"Two to four percent of cancers respond to chemotherapy."

-- Ralph Moss, Ph.D


Related Articles

The Cancer Report Documentary

The True Budwig Protocol

Additional Anti-Cancer Therapies That are Natural

Funny, Sad, and Thought Provoking Medical Quotations

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

The Relationship Between Body pH and Disease (and other facts you're not supposed to know)

A New Method of Poisoning Us With Radiation: 'High Efficiency' Light Bulbs

Video: The History Of The Illegal Hoxsey Cancer Cure

Beware of Deodorants, Especially The "Safe" and "All Natural" Ones

Shielding Yourself From Radiation and Dangerous Radioactive Exposure From Cancer Patient Emissions

A Precautionary Notice About Consuming Foods Containing Polyunsaturated Vegetable Oils; Even The Most Righteous Of Them All: Flax Seeds

Soy is Unfit for Human Consumption


Sara Elkins
# ACS Article Sara Elkins 2010-07-06 21:52
Ms. Sara Cain -

I would LOVE to talk to you further about this subject if you have time. Brilliant!

Sara Elkins

Director of Online Marketing and Development

Gateway for Cancer Research

Office: 847-342-7443

Fax: 847-342-7461

Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Vincent DiFortuna
# Stage 4Vincent DiFortuna 2011-01-25 12:07
I was diagnosed with Stage 4 cancer of unknown originn in Sept. 2009. At that time they guessed at a ademocarcinoma (I don't know if that is the correct term)and treated as a gastro-intestinal cancer. I was told that my group, about 5% only lived 6 months.

Well it's almost Feb. 2011 and I'm still here. I have been ungoing Chemo for about 16 months now.

My latest Catscan showed that the cancer had moved to the bone. In 2 of my ribs. I am going to my oncologist moday to disciss this latest development. He's talking radiation and chemo.

What is my alternative. I already trust him because he has kept me alive longer than expected but I'm hearing more and more about alternative methods that I am afraid to tackle.

It's my life and I love it. I'm between a rock and a hard place. What are my alternatives? Thanks

Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher)
# Sarah C. Corriher (H.W. Researcher) 2011-01-25 16:13
We stopped reading at the "I already trust him" part. There is nothing that we can do for a person like you. Once you have been poisoned to that degree, alternative treatments might not work.

We're way too busy to be jerked around, but you're welcome to come back when you're serious about healing yourself.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Thomas Corriher (Editor-in-Chief)
# Thomas Corriher (Editor-in-Chief) 2012-11-07 13:38
Sarah was correct. This woman is almost certainly dead now because she trusted her doctor. It is likely that she went to her grave thanking him for her being "still alive"; up to the point that his "medicine" killed her. It is a very familiar story for us, and we have sadly grown accustomed to such people who disingenuously ask for help. They are too brainwashed to see logic or to grab life preservers; regardless of how many they are thrown. They usually choose death over disobedience to their doctors.

To make the point: Doctors (like this one) declare death sentences upon people who do not seem compliant enough, as a means of manipulation. They "give" these people a number of months or weeks to live if the customers are in any way defiant, as if life and death were theirs' to give. The evil deception of the doctors is evident from the fact that an organic cancer cannot be predicted, and it cannot be predicted when (or even 'if') it will become fatal. Only the results of the medications can be reliably predicted, and that's how they can be so sure of their patients' short life spans.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote

Add comment

The Claimer: The information provided herein is intended to be a truthful and corrective alternative to the advice that is provided by physicians and other medical professionals. It is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, and prevent disease.